Sugar Mixture: Eutectic Potential and Effects

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phrak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixture Sugar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for a eutectic in mixtures of sugars, exploring the conditions under which eutectics can form, particularly in relation to miscibility and solid-state behavior. Participants also touch on the complexities of sugar configurations and their melting points.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that sugars may not form a eutectic because they are miscible in all proportions, citing commercial mixtures as examples.
  • Others argue that eutectics require specific conditions, particularly that substances must not be miscible in all proportions in the solid state.
  • A participant mentions the complexity of determining melting points for sugars due to their various configurations and potential decomposition.
  • One participant challenges the understanding of eutectics by referencing the tin-lead system, noting that while liquid forms are miscible, solid forms are not, which is crucial for eutectic formation.
  • Another participant raises questions about the terminology used for solid phases, suggesting that "solid solution" might be more appropriate than "miscible" in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether sugars can form a eutectic, with multiple competing views and uncertainties remaining regarding the conditions necessary for eutectic formation.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions of miscibility and solid solutions, as well as the specific behaviors of sugar mixtures under varying conditions.

Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
Does a mixture of sugars have a Eutectic?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I don't know the answer to this one, but my first guess would be no they are miscible in all proportions, since there are many commercial mixtures of treacle and syrup out there.
Toffee and fudge, of course, contain water and fat as well.
 
Studiot said:
I don't know the answer to this one, but my first guess would be no they are miscible in all proportions, since there are many commercial mixtures of treacle and syrup out there.
Toffee and fudge, of course, contain water and fat as well.

A eutectic is a mimum where the temperature of solidification from the liquid phase is least for different proportions of two compounds. The example I'm familiar with is lead and tin. I imagine two missible liquids like water and ethanol will also have a eutectic, or two different sugars like lactose and dextrose as well, though I really don't know.
 
I know what a eutectic is.

You do not get eutectics when the two substances are miscible in all proportions.
 
Studiot said:
I know what a eutectic is.

You do not get eutectics when the two substances are miscible in all proportions.

Only if they are miscible in all proportions in the solid state. I don't know whether this is true for sugars. Furthermore, the determination of the melting point for sugars is quite a mess as they tend to exist in various configurations (alpha and beta aldoles, dimers ...) and for many sugars the melting cannot be separated from decomposition.
 
I don't know what ya'all are talking about, Studiot. You can't even separate lead and tin into regions of solid state and liquid state but must include two others. There are regions on the ratio vs. temperature graph that are mixtures of both solid and liquid phase.

Lead and Tin have a Eutectic, they are missible in all proportions at the temperature above that of solidification of the maxima of both Lead or Tin.

...I just wanted to know how the manufactures of Pop Rocks decided to mix 3 sugars together to make their product successful...
 
Last edited:
I don't know what ya'all are talking about, Studiot

Here are sketches of two phase diagrams to clarify matters. One is the tin-lead system the other is the copper-nickel system.

As you rightly observe the tin-lead system has a eutectic point at 36% lead.
This is because liquid tin and liquid lead are miscible in all proportions, but solid tin and solid lead are not. That is they cannot form a solid solution because their lattices are incompatible. So any solid is a mixture of solid tin + solid lead.

On the other hand copper and nickel are miscible in all proportions in both the liquid and solid state so form an alloy at any composition in the solid. There is no eutectic in the phase diagram. The freezing and melting lines are different, as required by the phase rule.

I am sorry I have no such information for sugars.
 

Attachments

  • phasediags.jpg
    phasediags.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 653
Studiot said:
Here are sketches of two phase diagrams to clarify matters. One is the tin-lead system the other is the copper-nickel system.

As you rightly observe the tin-lead system has a eutectic point at 36% lead.
This is because liquid tin and liquid lead are miscible in all proportions, but solid tin and solid lead are not. That is they cannot form a solid solution because their lattices are incompatible. So any solid is a mixture of solid tin + solid lead.

On the other hand copper and nickel are miscible in all proportions in both the liquid and solid state so form an alloy at any composition in the solid. There is no eutectic in the phase diagram. The freezing and melting lines are different, as required by the phase rule.

I am sorry I have no such information for sugars.

Interesting. I'd forgotten about crystaline structures that can contain a pair of elements in any proportion. Is the term missible really used to talk about solid phases? This is unfamiliar to me.
Also we can have amorphous, or semi-amorphous solid states to further confuse the issue.

Equally, I hadn't considered that there may not be a eutectic minum between two or more compounds.

Thanks for the help.
 
Is the term missible really used to talk about solid phases?

Perhaps not often since miscible really implies that you can add one to the other and stir. Solid solution is more often used. There is more than one type of solid solution. Substitutional as in the case of cupro-nickel system and insterstitial as in the case of carbon and iron.

Some of the data came from what is IHMO the best Physical Chemistry text ever written,
Physical Chemistry by Moore.
He has a good chapter or three on this stuff.

go well
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K