Suggestions for Analytic Number Theory textbooks

  • Context: Number Theory 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pcm
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for textbooks in Analytic Number Theory (ANT), particularly for those new to the subject. Participants express their preferences and critiques of various texts, focusing on accessibility and motivation in the material.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses dissatisfaction with Apostol's book, citing a lack of motivation and suggesting it may not be suitable for beginners.
  • Another participant shares a link to suggestions from Math Stack Exchange, indicating a search for alternative resources.
  • Some participants mention finding other books helpful for grasping the basics of ANT, but do not specify which books they prefer.
  • There is a discussion about whether Apostol's book is perceived as boring or terse, with one participant confirming it is terse and noting they have not found a better alternative.
  • Supplementary materials such as Kedlaya's notes and an exposition by Knapp on Dirichlet's theorem are mentioned as useful resources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best textbook for ANT, with differing opinions on Apostol's book and varying suggestions for alternatives.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express a need for texts that are not too advanced, indicating a potential limitation in the complexity of recommended materials.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers looking for introductory resources in Analytic Number Theory, particularly those seeking alternatives to commonly referenced textbooks.

pcm
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Something other than Apostol's book which I find lacking in motivation. Not too advanced, since it is my first encounter with ANT.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pcm said:
Something other than Apostol's book which I find lacking in motivation. Not too advanced, since it is my first encounter with ANT.
I found this book excellent to get the basics down.

Do you just find it as a boring read, or terse?
 
MidgetDwarf said:
I found this book excellent to get the basics down.

Do you just find it as a boring read, or terse?
Terse. I checked other books and I didn't find one that was better. I am using this book for now and supplementing it with Kedlaya's notes, and for Dirichlet's theorem I found a nice exposition by Knapp.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K