MHB Sum of pqth Term in Arithmetic Progression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the sum of the pqth term in an arithmetic progression where the pth term is 1/q and the qth term is 1/p. By establishing equations for the first term (a1) and the common difference (d), both are found to equal 1/pq. Using the sum formula for an arithmetic progression, S_n = n/2(2a1 + (n-1)d), with n set to pq, the sum simplifies to pq. Ultimately, the sum of the pqth term is confirmed to be pq.
Doffy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
The pth term of an airthmetic progression is 1/q and qth term is 1/p. What is the sum of pqth term?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by stating:

$$a_p=a_1+(p-1)d=\frac{1}{q}$$

$$a_q=a_1+(q-1)d=\frac{1}{p}$$

Now, solve both for $a_1$...then equate the results and solve that for $d$...what do you find?
 
According to this, we find that a1=d=1/pq.
However, I am still confused about the sum of pqth term.
 
Doffy said:
According to this, we find that a1=d=1/pq.
However, I am still confused about the sum of pqth term.

Yes, that's correct. So now apply the formula:

$$S_n=\frac{n}{2}\left(2a_1+(n-1)d\right)$$

where:

$$n=pq,\,a_1=d=\frac{1}{pq}$$
 
What we then get is:

$$S_{pq}=\frac{pq}{2}\left(\frac{2}{pq}+\frac{pq-1}{pq}\right)=1+pq-1=pq$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top