MHB How do we find the sum of the roots in a quadratic equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots Sum
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Show that the sum of the roots of the equation

x^2 + px + q = 0 is -p.

I need help with the set up.

Is the discriminant involved here?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you get when you expand (x - a)(x - b)?
 
greg1313 said:
What do you get when you expand (x - a)(x - b)?

(x - a)(x - b)

x^2 - bx - ax + ab

After factoring by grouping, I found the roots to be x = a and x = b.

What is next?
 
Here's another approach:

Suppose we have:

$$ax^2+bx+c=0$$

Them by the quadratic formula, we have that the sum $S$ of the roots is given by:

$$S=\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}+\frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}=-\frac{b}{a}$$

Use this formula on the given quadratic...what do you find?
 
MarkFL said:
Here's another approach:

Suppose we have:

$$ax^2+bx+c=0$$

Them by the quadratic formula, we have that the sum $S$ of the roots is given by:

$$S=\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}+\frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}=-\frac{b}{a}$$

Use this formula on the given quadratic...what do you find?

Great job!

Ok. You said use -b/a.

Let b = p

Let a = 1

We get -p/1 = -p.

I got it!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top