Sum of two prime ideals is prime ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sihag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the properties of prime ideals in the context of algebraic geometry and ring theory, specifically exploring whether the sum of two prime ideals can itself be prime. Participants examine examples and counterexamples, as well as geometric interpretations related to ideals and their zero loci.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants seek counterexamples to the claim that the sum of two prime ideals is prime, noting difficulty in finding such examples.
  • One participant suggests that the sum of two ideals is generated by their union, linking this to geometric interpretations involving irreducible algebraic sets and their intersections.
  • Another participant considers the principal ideals <2> and <3> in Z, arguing that their sum results in Z itself, which cannot be prime by definition.
  • A participant introduces the concept of greatest common divisors (gcd) to illustrate that the sum of two ideals can lead to a non-prime ideal.
  • One participant mentions that the intersection of prime ideals may not necessarily be prime, providing examples such as 2Z and 3Z.
  • Another participant discusses the geometric interpretation of ideals in polynomial rings, suggesting that non-prime ideals correspond to curves that are unions of multiple other curves.
  • A specific example is provided involving a prime ideal of a cone and a prime ideal of a plane, demonstrating how their sum relates to the intersection of geometric objects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the sum of prime ideals, with some arguing that it cannot be prime while others explore geometric interpretations that suggest more complexity. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the original question.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions and interpretations related to the definitions of prime ideals and their geometric representations, indicating that the discussion is influenced by differing mathematical frameworks and contexts.

sihag
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
i was looking for a counter example.

and, I've not been able to think of any.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
look at Z
 
the sum of two ideals is the ideal generated by their union right?

thus geometrically it is the ideal of the intersection of the two zero loci.

so look for a pair of irreducible algebraic sets whose intersection is reducible,

(like a quadric surface and a tangent plane.)

i.e. a prime ideal is one that has a (reduced and) irreducible zero set.
 
i did not understand the geometric bit.
well i considered the principal ideals <2> and <3>
their union includes 1 which is a unit in Z, so the ideal of the sum is nothing but Z itself right ?
and that can't be prime by definition ? (since an ideal P is prime => P /= R (the ring in consideration))
more hints please.
 
sihag said:
i did not understand the geometric bit.
well i considered the principal ideals <2> and <3>
their union includes 1 which is a unit in Z, so the ideal of the sum is nothing but Z itself right ?
and that can't be prime by definition ? (since an ideal P is prime => P /= R (the ring in consideration))
more hints please.

yea that's fine, just notice 1 = -1*2 + 1*3

another way to think about it is in terms of existence of gcd's. gcd(2, 3) = 1, so there are x, y in Z such that 2x + 3y = 1 and this is in <2> + <3>, but this is an ideal, so x = x*1 is in <2> + <3> for all x in Z, so yea Z = <2> + <3>, probably overkill but a useful observation

this can be generalized and is really useful, if R is a pid, then Ra + Rb = Rd where d = gcd(a, b)

when looking for counterexamples always think simple(doesn't always work but sometimes it does), like for example 2Z and 3Z are prime but 2Z n 3Z = 6Z is not, so the intersection of prime ideals isn't necessarily prime
 
Last edited:
sihag said:
i did not understand the geometric bit.
Think of rings like R[x, y]. Algebraic curves (like the parabola y - x^2 = 0) correspond to ideals (like the ideal <y - x^2>). Sums of ideals relate to intersections of curves. Can you work out why? Do you see how a non-prime ideal corresponds, in some sense, into a curve that is the union of two or more other curves?
 
a prime ideal of a cone is (Z^2 -X^2-Y^2).

a prime ideal of a plane is (Y).

the sum of these ideals (Z^2 -X^2-Y^2, Y) = (Z^2 -X^2, Y), is the ideal of the intersection, which is the two lines Z=X, Z=-X, in the X,Z plane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K