sihag
- 28
- 0
i was looking for a counter example.
and, I've not been able to think of any.
and, I've not been able to think of any.
The discussion centers around the properties of prime ideals in the context of algebraic geometry and ring theory, specifically exploring whether the sum of two prime ideals can itself be prime. Participants examine examples and counterexamples, as well as geometric interpretations related to ideals and their zero loci.
Participants express differing views on the nature of the sum of prime ideals, with some arguing that it cannot be prime while others explore geometric interpretations that suggest more complexity. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the original question.
Participants highlight various assumptions and interpretations related to the definitions of prime ideals and their geometric representations, indicating that the discussion is influenced by differing mathematical frameworks and contexts.
sihag said:i did not understand the geometric bit.
well i considered the principal ideals <2> and <3>
their union includes 1 which is a unit in Z, so the ideal of the sum is nothing but Z itself right ?
and that can't be prime by definition ? (since an ideal P is prime => P /= R (the ring in consideration))
more hints please.
Think of rings like R[x, y]. Algebraic curves (like the parabola y - x^2 = 0) correspond to ideals (like the ideal <y - x^2>). Sums of ideals relate to intersections of curves. Can you work out why? Do you see how a non-prime ideal corresponds, in some sense, into a curve that is the union of two or more other curves?sihag said:i did not understand the geometric bit.