MHB Sum of Two Squares: Can $5^{64}-3^{64}$ Be Written?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Squares Sum
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the expression $5^{64}-3^{64}$ can be represented as the sum of two squares. Participants reference the identity that states the product of two sums of squares can also be expressed as a sum of two squares. Dan expresses gratitude for contributions from others, including Kali and Opalg, who provided explanations and solutions. The conversation highlights the collaborative effort to explore this mathematical question. Ultimately, the focus remains on the mathematical properties related to sums of squares.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Is it possible to write $5^{64}-3^{64}$ as the sum of two squares?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Is it possible to write $5^{64}-3^{64}$ as the sum of two squares?

$5^{64}-3^{64}$
=$(5^{32}+3^{32})(5^{16}+3^{16})(5^8+3^8)(5^4+3^4)(5^2+3^2)(5+3)(5-3)$
= $16((5^{32}+3^{32})(5^{16}+3^{16})(5^8+3^8)(5^4+3^4)(5^2+3^2)$
= $4^2((5^{32}+3^{32})(5^{16}+3^{16})(5^8+3^8)(5^4+3^4)(5^2+3^2)$

as product of 2 numbers both sum of 2 squares can be represented as sum of 2 squares and 4^2 is a square so argument repeatedly we have the ans Yes
 
I'm not familiar with this theorem. Are you saying that any form [math](a^{2p} + b^{2p})(c^{2q} + d^{2q} )(e^{2r} + f^{2r})[/math] can always be written as the sum of two squares? Or do we additionally need c = e =a, d = f = b or something?
-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I'm not familiar with this theorem. Are you saying that any form [math](a^{2p} + b^{2p})(c^{2q} + d^{2q} )(e^{2r} + f^{2r})[/math] can always be written as the sum of two squares? Or do we additionally need c = e =a, d = f = b or something?
-Dan
[sp]
The identity $(a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2) = (ac+bd)^2 + (ad-bc)^2$ shows that a product of sums of two squares is also a sum of two squares.
[/sp]
 
(Doh) I knew that one.

Thanks!

-Dan
 
Thanks Kali for your solution!

And thanks to Opalg too for explaining thing for topsquark! I appreciate that!
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
33K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K