Sums and Intersections of Submodules .... Berrick and Keating Exercise 1.2.12

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercise Sums
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Exercise 1.2.12 from "An Introduction to Rings and Modules With K-Theory in View" by A.J. Berrick and M.E. Keating. Participants are tasked with proving two properties regarding submodules of a module M. The first property asserts that if a submodule N' contains all M_i, then N must be contained in N'. The second property states that if a submodule L' is contained in all M_i, it must also be contained in L. The discussion emphasizes the importance of demonstrating that the intersection of the M_i is a submodule of M.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of submodules in module theory
  • Familiarity with intersection properties of sets
  • Knowledge of closure properties in module addition
  • Basic concepts from ring theory and K-theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of submodules in module theory
  • Learn about the closure of module addition in detail
  • Explore the concept of intersections in algebraic structures
  • Review examples of submodules in the context of K-theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in abstract algebra, particularly those focusing on module theory and K-theory, will benefit from this discussion.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading An Introduction to Rings and Modules With K-Theory in View by A.J. Berrick and M.E. Keating (B&K).

I need help with Exercise 1.2.12 ...

Exercise 1.2.12 reads as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/5102
Can someone please help me to get started on this problem ...

Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to show two things:

1) If $N'$ is a submodule of $M$ such that $M_i \subseteq N'$ for all $i \in I$, that $N \subseteq N'$.

2) If $L'$ is a submodule of $M$ such that $L' \subseteq M_i$ for all $i \in I$, that $L' \subseteq L$.

The second property is well-nigh obvious, if $L' \subseteq M_i$ for each $i$, it is surely in $\bigcap\limits_i M_i$, by the definition of intersection.

Of course, it may help to prove that $\bigcap\limits_i M_i$ is indeed a submodule of $M$.

Number 1) is a little trickier, you may wish to show instead that $N$ is the smallest submodule of $M$ containing the set:

$\bigcup\limits_i M_i$ hint: use the closure of module addition.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K