How Did Ancient People Calculate Celestial Measurements?

  • Context: Stargazing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Damned2Hell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Moon Sun
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on how ancient civilizations calculated celestial measurements, specifically focusing on mass, gravity, and distances of celestial bodies like the sun, moon, and Earth. Participants emphasize the importance of basic astronomical knowledge, including lunar phases and Newton's laws, while critiquing the validity of using lunar period ratios to estimate Earth's gravity. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper understanding of historical astronomy and the mathematical principles involved in celestial calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic knowledge of Newton's laws of motion
  • Understanding of lunar phases and their durations
  • Familiarity with historical astronomy
  • Basic trigonometry concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical methods used in ancient astronomy
  • Learn about the mathematical principles behind celestial mechanics
  • Study the relationship between lunar cycles and gravitational calculations
  • Explore the significance of observational astronomy in ancient civilizations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, historians of science, educators in physics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of celestial measurements.

Damned2Hell
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could you prove to me how one might calculate things like mass, gravity, distance, of the sun, moon and Earth, very quickly, with only some basic knowledge. Such as 365.25 per year, min, avg and max times for the moon to complete a lunar phase 29.26,29.53,29.8). I'm attempting to understand how ancient people may have found those answers. But I'd like to know the best methods, to figure out older possible methods more quickly. If you don't know what I'm getting at with the included estimates, 29.26/29.8= 0.98187, a close estimate of Earth's gravity. While it's easy enough to see the relationship with a few calculations, I'd want to understand how to make the calculation without having read gravity is 9.807 m/s^2. And to build on that understanding, for other calculations.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What research have you done on this so far? What have you found out?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
I know a lot as far as knowing there are a lot of numbers that are very closely related. As far as being able to look at the min and max times from lunar phase to lunar phase and know I could calculate gravity, I can't. What made you ask what I know, is it something you're studying?
 
Damned2Hell said:
Could you prove to me how one might calculate things like mass, gravity, distance, of the sun, moon and Earth, very quickly, with only some basic knowledge.
Be more specific with your question. What particularly do you not understand?
Hint: observations, Newton's laws and trigonometry are you best friends to find the answers.
Damned2Hell said:
Such as 365.25 per year, min, avg and max times for the moon to complete a lunar phase 29.26,29.53,29.8). I'm attempting to understand how ancient people may have found those answers.
Why do you think that ancient civilizations managed to calculate mass of the celestial bodies, or that
they found laws describing the gravity? Use google to read about history of astronomy, there are plenty of texts out there.
Damned2Hell said:
If you don't know what I'm getting at with the included estimates, 29.26/29.8= 0.98187, a close estimate of Earth's gravity.
This looks like numerology! You cannot calculate gravitational acceleration at the Earth's surface just by dividing observed lunar periods!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Damned2Hell said:
If you don't know what I'm getting at with the included estimates, 29.26/29.8= 0.98187, a close estimate of Earth's gravity.

Nonsense. It's an order of magnitude off if you're using meters and seconds. The fact is that your estimate is just close to 1 because the Moon doesn't have much variation in its orbit. Earth's gravitational acceleration could be literally anything and your number wouldn't change much as long as the Moon's orbit was stable.
 
Damned2Hell said:
I know a lot as far as knowing there are a lot of numbers that are very closely related. As far as being able to look at the min and max times from lunar phase to lunar phase and know I could calculate gravity, I can't. What made you ask what I know, is it something you're studying?
Because this is not a Q&A forum. We expect people to have put in some effort themselves, and to show it, as part of asking a question. We don't just do your research for you.
 
Drakkith said:
Nonsense
Agreed. The ultimate sign of this being that the numbers do not even have the same physical dimension. ”Nonsense” is fully appropriate.
 
And since this new user has now taken the "Down Elevator" for some issues in a different thread, this thread here can be closed. Thanks for your helpful replies, folks. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
61K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
9K