Super position? or super assumption?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shinns
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Position
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of superposition in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to the double slit experiment. The original poster questions the concept of superpositions, suggesting that aether displacement may provide a more intuitive explanation for particle behavior. They argue that aether theory accounts for phenomena without relying on superposition, while others counter that interpretations of quantum mechanics, including the standard interpretation, effectively explain the behavior of particles without the need for aether. The debate highlights the tension between established quantum theories and alternative explanations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly superposition and wave-particle duality.
  • Familiarity with the double slit experiment and its implications in quantum theory.
  • Knowledge of aether theories and their historical context in physics.
  • Awareness of quantum phenomena such as coherence and Bell-type experiments.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the double slit experiment on quantum mechanics interpretations.
  • Explore aether theories and their critiques in the context of modern physics.
  • Study the coherence gap in SQUID experiments conducted at Delft and Stony Brook.
  • Investigate alternative interpretations of quantum mechanics, including pilot-wave theory.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of quantum theory and alternative explanations for particle behavior.

Shinns
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, after examining the double slit experiment and pondering for several days, I came to the conclusion that the notion of superpositions is a bit of a "leap of faith."

"Evidence" for superpositions is said to be the double slit experiment, but could the Idea of superpositions be a false conclusion?



Now that i have cast my doubt on superpositions, it's only fair that i provide an alternative explanation; aether displacement.

Now i know Aether theories are kind of "fringe" but in all fairness, not nearly as many resources have gone into the study of AT compared to QT.

Aether theory seems to account for the particles without superposition.


The idea is basically that the particle's momentum creates ripples or waves in the aether, and while these "aether waves" go through both slits, the particle only goes through one or the other. The particle then "rides" the interference pattern created by the coherent aether wave patterns. When the particles are examined, it disturbs the coherence of the aether waves.


I'm not saying this theory is correct, but it seems to account for the phenomenon much more intuitively than superposition theory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Then you need to find an explanation for bonding-antibonding phenomenon in chemistry, the existence of coherence gap in the SQUID experiments of Delft/Stony Brook, a slew of Bell-type experiments, etc.. etc.

Zz.
 
Shinns, there are interpretations of QM similar to yours. They say that the particle actually does go through one slit, and the wavefunction guides the motion of the particle. But these theories are much worse than the standard interpretation.
As one example, think of a single electron (in an s shell) in an atom. In standard interpretation, the electron is a superposition of many position states. But in your theory, the electron would have to be at a particular position. But if the electron was in a particular position, then a dipole electric field would be created. But experimentally, no dipole electric field is observed. So the electron cannot have one particular position.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
12K