I've been curious for some time about the concept of super position. my introduction to the idea was through the schrodingers cat paradox, which i assume most know, so i will stick with this example. is it not correct to assume super position is a concept to resolve the perceptual limitations of the observer to know with 100% accuracy an unobserved event? there may be far too much to take into consideration when predicting the behaviors of particles that, mathematically, it cannot be expressed with certainty but the present state of the unobserved event is, none the less, 'locked in'. The cat is either alive or dead but, with our current models, we cannot predict which with 100% accuracy essentially boiling down to "we just wont know until we look" rather than a fundamental characteristic of the universe. could super position just be a 'band-aid theory' to cover up the mathematical limitations of predicting events with a large number of variables to take into account?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Super position and mathematical limitations

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**