Supermassive BH feeding on Dark matter

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dmitry67
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark matter Matter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction between supermassive black holes and dark matter, exploring whether these black holes can significantly consume dark matter and the implications for their growth. Participants examine theoretical aspects, potential models, and the relationship between baryonic and dark matter in galaxies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that typical black holes do not feed on dark matter due to their small size, while supermassive black holes may consume significant amounts of dark matter due to their larger event horizons and central galactic locations.
  • Others argue that gravitationally, there is no difference between regular matter and dark matter, implying that both should behave similarly when falling into a black hole.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the significance of dark matter's impact on black hole growth, noting the variation in supermassive black hole masses across galaxies.
  • Another participant points out that the amount of dark matter in a galaxy varies less than baryonic matter, suggesting this could influence the observed ratios of matter types.
  • A later reply discusses the feedback mechanisms in baryonic physics that may alter the baryonic to dark matter ratio, proposing that this drives the variation in supermassive black hole masses.
  • One participant references a model involving dark MACHOs (baryonic dark matter) as a feeding mechanism for black holes, challenging the standard Cold Dark Matter theory.
  • Another participant counters that MACHOs do not account for a significant fraction of missing baryons, indicating that most baryonic matter remains in gaseous form.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the role of dark matter in black hole growth, with no consensus reached on the significance of dark matter consumption by supermassive black holes or the implications for their formation and evolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the relationship between baryonic and dark matter, noting that variations in baryonic densities can significantly affect the observed ratios of matter types in galaxies. The discussion also touches on unresolved assumptions regarding the uniformity of dark matter distribution during galaxy formation.

Dmitry67
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
1
I know that typical Black Holes don't feed on Dark matter because they are tiny, so the direct hit is unlikely. While normal matter has friction and can slow down close to the BH, Dark matter just pass it by.

What's about supermassive (>10^10 solar masses) black holes?
Do they consume significant amounts of the dark matter? Radius of the event horizon is proportional to the mass, and the probability of the 'direct hit' - is M squared. Supermassive BH can consume up to 10^20 times more Dark matter than Sun. Even more, supermassive BH usually resides in the center of galaxies, and that position favours the consumpiton of DM.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Doesn't sound right to me. Gravitationally, there is no difference between regular matter and dark matter. Massive amounts of regular matter falling into a black hole might have a slight difference because of internal collisions but other than that the two should be the same.
 
Dmitry67 said:
I know that typical Black Holes don't feed on Dark matter because they are tiny, so the direct hit is unlikely. While normal matter has friction and can slow down close to the BH, Dark matter just pass it by.

What's about supermassive (>10^10 solar masses) black holes?
Do they consume significant amounts of the dark matter? Radius of the event horizon is proportional to the mass, and the probability of the 'direct hit' - is M squared. Supermassive BH can consume up to 10^20 times more Dark matter than Sun. Even more, supermassive BH usually resides in the center of galaxies, and that position favours the consumpiton of DM.
There may be some impact of dark matter on black hole growth. But I strongly suspect it isn't all that significant. If it were, then there wouldn't be such a tremendous variation in the masses of the supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies.
 
Chalnoth said:
There may be some impact of dark matter on black hole growth. But I strongly suspect it isn't all that significant. If it were, then there wouldn't be such a tremendous variation in the masses of the supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies.

Hm ... I don't follow that. Could you expand on it a bit?
 
phinds said:
Hm ... I don't follow that. Could you expand on it a bit?
The amount of dark matter in a galaxy varies far less than the amount of baryonic matter.
 
Chalnoth said:
The amount of dark matter in a galaxy varies far less than the amount of baryonic matter.

DOH ! ... I knew that, just wasn't connecting the dots. Thanks.

Do we know if the dark matter was as uniformly distributed as the galaxies were forming as it appears to be now?
 
phinds said:
DOH ! ... I knew that, just wasn't connecting the dots. Thanks.

Do we know if the dark matter was as uniformly distributed as the galaxies were forming as it appears to be now?
Well, in general you end up with massive differences in baryonic densities the moment stars start to turn on, because stars tend to blow matter out of lighter galaxies. It is this, I think that drives the vastly different ratios of baryonic matter to dark matter that we see in various galaxies. If it weren't for this sort of feedback, I think we'd expect all galaxies to simply track the average baryon/dark matter ratio we observe in the CMB.

This is the point, I think: it's not so much that dark matter doesn't vary, but instead that baryonic physics tends to dramatically alter the ratio of baryonic matter to dark matter.

So in the end, I think we can trace the majority of the variation in the ratio supermassive black hole mass to halo mass to be due to the baryonic content.
 
I recently gave an explanation in arXiv:1108.1697: "Model for common growth of supermassive black holes, bulges and globular star clusters: ripping off Jeans clusters". The BHs are fed by dark MACHOs (small Jupiters), that is: baryonic dark matter (missing baryons). This mechanism stems with Carlos Frenk's great insight (known to several others since 15 years) that the standard theory of Cold Dark Matter would be wrong.
 
theon said:
I recently gave an explanation in arXiv:1108.1697: "Model for common growth of supermassive black holes, bulges and globular star clusters: ripping off Jeans clusters". The BHs are fed by dark MACHOs (small Jupiters), that is: baryonic dark matter (missing baryons). This mechanism stems with Carlos Frenk's great insight (known to several others since 15 years) that the standard theory of Cold Dark Matter would be wrong.
MACHO's don't make up a significant fraction of the missing baryons. The vast majority of the baryonic matter remains as gas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K