Superposition of Electric Potential problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the total electric potential energy of a system consisting of three charges: -q at (-d,0), +2q at (d,0), and +3q at (0,d). The correct formula for electric potential energy between two charges is established as Uq,Q = (kqQ)/r. The confusion arises regarding the sign of the electric potential when moving from lower to higher potential charges, particularly in the case of the positive charges. The final total electric potential energy is calculated as Utotal = (3kq²/√2d) - (kq²/d).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential energy and its calculation.
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and the constant k.
  • Knowledge of vector addition in electric fields.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving charges and distances.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential energy formulas in electrostatics.
  • Learn about the superposition principle in electric fields.
  • Explore the implications of charge polarity on electric potential calculations.
  • Investigate the relationship between electric potential and electric field strength.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in electrostatics or electric potential calculations will benefit from this discussion.

Lo.Lee.Ta.
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
1. A system consists of the charges -q at (-d,0), +2q at (d,0), and +3q at (0,d). What is the total electric potential energy of the system.

2. I'm wondering, is it necessary to calculate each electric potential between charges from lower electron potential to higher electron potential?

-V-q to +3q = \frac{k(-q)}{\sqrt{2}d} + \frac{k(+3q)}{\sqrt{2}d}

V= -\frac{2kq}{\sqrt{2}d}



-V-q to +2q = \frac{k(-q)}{2d} + \frac{k(+2q)}{2d}

V= -\frac{kq}{2d}



-V+2q to +3q = \frac{k(+2q)}{\sqrt{2}d} + \frac{k(+3q)}{\sqrt{2}d}

V= -\frac{5kq}{2d}


The book solution says this last V should equal positive \frac{k(2q)(3q)}{\sqrt{2}d}...
But more simplified, that would equal: 6q2k/\sqrt{2}d

So, how did they get this? And- why is it positive?


I thought that if we have low electric potential to high electric potential, then ΔV= (-)

(Va - Vb = ΔV = low - high = a NEGATIVE number)

In the first 2 calculations, we went from -q to +2q and -q to +3q.
So this means we went from LOW potential to HIGH potential. So it would make sense that these two V values are negative.

But the third also goes from lower to higher potential (+2q to +3q)... So why isn't this one also negative...?

#=_= So confused. :confused:

Please help? Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, to find the electric potential due to two charges q and Q separated by a distance r, you need to use the equation:

Vq,Q = \frac{kqQ}{r}

To get the total electric potential you need to add up the electric potentials from each pair of charges. So for the last one you can see that it would in fact be what the book says. This is because both charges are positive. It doesn't matter in what order you calculate them, you will be adding them all up. So:

Vnet = V1,2 + V1,3 + V2,3
 
Oh, wow!

My problem was not using the right formula! :P

Formula for electric potential energy between charges: Uq,Q = (kqQ)/r


Formula for electric potential between charges: Vq,Q = \frac{kq}{x} + \frac{kQ}{(x2)-x}

Let me know if I have this right, please:
If I have 2 charges (q at x=5 and Q at x=20), and I want to know the electric potential between them, I would say:
Vq,Q=\frac{kq}{5} + \frac{kQ}{20-5}

Is this the right expression?


Alright, back to my orginial problem...
Total electric potential energy of system:

Utotal = \frac{-kq(2q)}{2d} + \frac{-kq(3q)}{\sqrt{2}d} + \frac{k(2q)(3q)}{\sqrt{2}d}

Utotal = \frac{3kq^2}{\sqrt{2}d} - \frac{kq^2}{d}

Thanks for the help! :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K