Superstrings and the Laws of Physics

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the idea that superstrings might dictate the laws of physics, suggesting that manipulating them could alter these laws. However, skepticism arises regarding the feasibility of altering superstrings due to their minuscule size. Some participants express concern about the implications of changing physical laws, highlighting the potential for both invaluable advancements and disastrous consequences. A philosophical question is raised about the applicability of physical laws in a void where no matter exists. The conversation reflects a tension between open-mindedness and adherence to established scientific principles.
Bunting
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Im by no means an expert on any quantum phemonina, but here goes!

I believe the law's of physics must be dictated by something, a physical quantity if you will. Like laws are enforced upon earth, only in a much better manner! If the smallest possible thing is one of these "superstrings", would it then be "ok", to say that superstrings dictate the rules of physics and everything, and thus being able to manipulate superstrings may be being able to change the laws of physics?

Ive been told there's no feasible way of altering a superstring though, there way too small (like a tree compared to the universe would be 1 string). However this is from a very sceptical physisist, who beleives all practical quantum theory methods proposed (such as quantum teleportation) is "hogwash". I know some people here have more open minds, and so i was wondering what you thought! Being able to alter the laws of physics could prove invaluable, but could also prove disasterous! ANy thoughts ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your mind is too open, all the sense might leak out. If you want to listen to people who deny what modern physics has found out and confirmed by experiement, because they flatter your naive beliefs, then go right ahead. You have nothing to lose but your chance of understanding how nature really works.
 
ok, so maybe it is a bit "stupid", but if theere is indeed a place with no matter. No atoms, no neutrinos, no strings even, do the laws of physics apply there ? if there's nothing there, could laws be maintained ?

i thought the point was that I am not neccessarily listening to what this guy has said, i don't understand your second part of that reply :-/
 
if there's nothing there , how can laws govern nothing?
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
536
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 445 ·
15
Replies
445
Views
29K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K