1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Surfaces and geodesics in General Relativity

  1. Nov 22, 2008 #1
    Hi all. This is one of the problems that I was asked to do for my General Relativity class. I know this may look a little long, but if anyone can help me out with ANYTHING about this problem, I will greatly appreciate it.

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Consider the family of hypersurfaces where each member is defined by the constancy of the function S(xc) over that hypersurface and further require that each hypersurface be a null hypersurface in the sense that its normal vector field, na = S|a , be a null vector field.
    Let ¡ be a member of the family of curves that pierces each such hypersurface orthogonally, meaning that the tangent vector to ¡, say ka, is everywhere collinear with the vector na at the point of piercing. Show that ¡ is a null geodesic and find the condition on the relation between na and ka that allows the geodesic equation to be written in the simple form ka||bka = 0.
    Interpret your results in terms of waves and rays.


    2. Relevant equations
    The geodesic equation: [tex]\ddot{x}[/tex]e + [tex]\Gamma[/tex]emb[tex]\dot{x}[/tex]m [tex]\dot{x}[/tex]b = 0


    3. The attempt at a solution
    By reading through the problem it is not very hard to get the hang of what it is saying, and it seems pretty clear that [itex]\Gamma[/itex] must be a null surface. But I don't know where to get started in showing that it is a "null geodesic", and how to derive at the simple geodesic equation they give. I'm just very stuck here. If anyone can give me a little hint I would appreciate it. Thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 24, 2008 #2
    No relativists here? :S
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Surfaces and geodesics in General Relativity
  1. General Relativity (Replies: 4)

Loading...