HyperTechno
- 142
- 7
I'm sure as my existence that there were no dinosaurs in 1816!rollete said:I'd make some dinosaur friends.
I'm sure as my existence that there were no dinosaurs in 1816!rollete said:I'd make some dinosaur friends.
HyperTechno said:I'm sure as my existence that there were no dinosaurs in 1816!
micromass said:Assume that you are being sent back in time. You can choose the exact time period, but it has to be more than 200 years ago.
I just missed the "more than" part.rollete said:I grasp English.
Well. the topic is very attractive that it's hard to stay within the limits...rollete said:You and everyone else in this thread, apparently. Very odd.

I saw it, but thought 1816 would be the most interesting time.rollete said:You and everyone else in this thread, apparently. Very odd.
Cognitively it may be related to the "too sure of oneself" bias. There must be a technical term for it. The following is an illustrative example. Suppose subjects were being asked to name a number greater than the experimenter's age which they had to guess. It should be an easy game to win; the experimenter must in all likelihood be no older than than 509 years, so 510, or 50,000, or 2 trillion, or a googol are all right answers. But instead the subjects would try to guess at her age and then add small integers to the age they guessed. So most answers would be like "38" or "55".rollete said:You and everyone else in this thread, apparently. Very odd.
Rubidium_71 said:The best way to fit into the community and make friends would be to offer a practical benefit by helping people. One of the more straightforward methods would be to introduce penicillin in 1816 and keep some of that disease under control. One could potentially earn a decent living as a healer.
A person could also warn folks about upcoming disasters like the Krakatoa eruption of 1883, but I am more pessimistic about human superstition and how people might react to someone accurately predicting future events.
In July of 1888 I might retire to Willoughby, Ohio. I hear it can be quite nice there.
EnumaElish said:Cognitively it may be related to the "too sure of oneself" bias. There must be a technical term for it. The following is an illustrative example. Suppose subjects were being asked to name a number greater than the experimenter's age which they had to guess. It should be an easy game to win; the experimenter must in all likelihood be no older than than 509 years, so 510, or 50,000, or 2 trillion, or a googol are all right answers. But instead the subjects would try to guess at her age and then add small integers to the age they guessed. So most answers would be like "38" or "55".
I'd plan to start with blue cheese gone bad, then move to bathtub mold :) if nothing else they should offer a placebo effect. I think there'd be very little room to make the early 19th-century patient worse, or in any case make too many of them very much worse, although getting it right might take a few years.micromass said:So you know how to obtain and cultivate penicillin?
I did some searching. The closest I can find is Anchoring bias, although my recollection is that the process involved some kind of estimation, and subjects were overconfident in how precisely they could guess the anchor itself (experimenter's age in my example). But cannot find the source at the moment. In all likelihood I might have seen it in Sci. Am. or perhaps in Psych. Today.mfb said:Is there a study about that? Sounds interesting.

tionis said:So I will go back and paint portraits of the modern world to sell on the markets. Also write down all the songs that I know and pass them on as my own thus thwarting the composing careers of future artists![]()
Yes.micromass said:So you know how to obtain and cultivate penicillin?
Mark44 said:Sure,
I sarcast
you sarcast
he/she/it sarcasts
we sarcast
you (pl.) sarcast
they sarcast
m k said:Can't remember why it's 1816 but wouldn't it be easier farer back?
micromass said:Assume that you are being sent back in time. You can choose the exact time period, but it has to be more than 200 years ago. You cannot bring anything with you.
How would you use your current knowledge in order to survive? Would you be able to get rich/famous/powerful? Note: you cannot learn anything new before going, you'll have to rely on everything you know right now.
Assume that language barriers won't be an issue.
Kevin McHugh said:Can you translate your position as well? Or do we stay in place, and travel back in time?
Don't know the period but some time when many of our everyday stuff is still unknown.micromass said:I don't know, would it? Can you explain what time period would be easiest and how you would do it?
Joyal Babu said:Since I already know the history of how things are to be,I will use this knowledge of mine to become rich/famous/powerful you name it.