Suspension interaction with car

In summary, the problem at hand involves understanding the physics of suspension interaction with a vehicle chassis. The car in question has a very high horsepower and small tires, and the race tracks are prepped with a glue that increases traction. The main issue is the spread between the upper and lower control arms, which causes the front of the car to roll up from axle housing rotation. The speaker is trying to understand the forces involved and how they affect the car's body, and is wondering if the control arm spacing is the cause of this issue. They also mention the impact of the car's center of gravity on the lifting effect of the car's body.
  • #1
Tom Rauji
45
6
I need help or guidance at a physics level understanding suspension interaction with a vehicle chassis. Here is the problem.

I have a very high horsepower car with small tires. The race tracks are prepped with a glue. It is very easy to go over 1500 HP with a pretty high gear ratio. For example on the starting line my system has about 900 lb-ft torque through a 2.0 torque converter multiplication through a 1.68 ratio low gear to a 4.10 rear gear. That 900*2.0*1.68* 4.1= 12,400 lb-ft or 6200 lb-ft per tire drives the car off the line. The tires actually can plant that torque to the track without slipping. Some of this is by virtue of the glue, and some by the rear axle separating from the chassis and being thrown down into the track as the body is pushed upward and forward.

My problem is understanding arm angles and how they affect the body. I'd like the rear axle to push on or slightly below the center of gravity so the car does not roll up in the front, barely lifting the front wheels so all weight sits on the back tires. If I could understand the forces I could reason through this.

The rear suspension setup is not ideal and I can't change anything except control arm angles. The main issue is the spread between the upper control arms (UCA) that pull backwards and the lower control arms (LCA) that push forward.

This is a rough drawing. My feeling is the spread between UCA and LCA attachment causes the front to roll up from axle housing rotation. Front roll up is the issue I am fighting.
Rotation%20forces5.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Rotation%20forces5.jpg
    Rotation%20forces5.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 1,224
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Tom Rauji said:
I need help or guidance at a physics level understanding suspension interaction with a vehicle chassis. Here is the problem.

I have a very high horsepower car with small tires. The race tracks are prepped with a glue. It is very easy to go over 1500 HP with a pretty high gear ratio. For example on the starting line my system has about 900 lb-ft torque through a 2.0 torque converter multiplication through a 1.68 ratio low gear to a 4.10 rear gear. That 900*2.0*1.68* 4.1= 12,400 lb-ft or 6200 lb-ft per tire drives the car off the line. The tires actually can plant that torque to the track without slipping. Some of this is by virtue of the glue, and some by the rear axle separating from the chassis and being thrown down into the track as the body is pushed upward and forward.

My problem is understanding arm angles and how they affect the body. I'd like the rear axle to push on or slightly below the center of gravity so the car does not roll up in the front, barely lifting the front wheels so all weight sits on the back tires. If I could understand the forces I could reason through this.

The rear suspension setup is not ideal and I can't change anything except control arm angles. The main issue is the spread between the upper control arms (UCA) that pull backwards and the lower control arms (LCA) that push forward.

This is a rough drawing. My feeling is the spread between UCA and LCA attachment causes the front to roll up from axle housing rotation. Front roll up is the issue I am fighting. View attachment 216278
Why would you try to use glue to increase the coefficient of friction with the track? Any gains in traction will be offset by power lost to unstick the trailing edge of the tires from the track.
 
  • #3
Thanks for the comment, but my question is not about racetrack preparation. The track preps the surface with a special type of glue. The glue will rip your shoes off and sometimes tear the soles off tennis shoes, it does not bother tires rolling any noticeable amount other than to greatly increase traction. That aside, track preparation (while fascinating) isn't any part of my question.

My question is about the physics of the suspension. Because the axle housing tries to rotate opposite the tires and axles, the upper control arms pull backwards. The lower control arms push into the car because of the rear housing trying to rotate plus the tire pushing on the track. Let's assume 10,000 lb-ft of torque. It seems to me the control arms being about 3.7 inches out from axle center, would be sharing about 32000 pounds of the housing "twist".

Should this be treated as an isolated force that because of arm spacing tries to rotate the car body upwards in the front, with the upper arm pulling back and the front pushing forward? The tire thrust on the track would then add to each, leaving the upper arms pulling backward and the lower arms pushing into the chassis?

I'm trying to get my head around this. I believe the reaction on the car chassis is much different with the arms separated so far than it is in a true racing four link where both arms are longer and both arms eventually tie very close to the same point instead of ~7 inches apart.

Thanks, Tom
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #4
As for the car CG vs the applied force. The only way to eliminate that lifting effect would be to have the car CG at the same height as F3 (i.e. to have the car CG at ground level) which is clearly a nonstarter.

With regard to the effect of of the arm lengths and connection points, the longer the distance from the arms' axle connections to the arms' body connection points the lower the lifting force applied at the body connection points. My thought being that the best arm/body connection location would be directly below the cars CG point.

Either way you are going to to end up with some body lifting effect from both sources.
 
  • #5
JBA said:
As for the car CG vs the applied force. The only way to eliminate that lifting effect would be to have the car CG at the same height as F3 (i.e. to have the car CG at ground level) which is clearly a nonstarter.

With regard to the effect of of the arm lengths and connection points, the longer the distance from the arms' axle connections to the arms' body connection points the lower the lifting force applied at the body connection points. My thought being that the best arm/body connection location would be directly below the cars CG point.

Either way you are going to to end up with some body lifting effect from both sources.
Thanks!

I've had 4 link cars and ladder bar cars. I understand those systems and their interaction with CoG OK.

The question I have is the wider spacing of the LCA and UCA in this stock suspension. With the UCA 6-7 inches above the LCA, that is quite a spread. With UCA pulling backwards and not pushing on the car at all, it seems the UCA would be mostly influencing front lift. It doesn't push, it can't push on the CoG so the UCA angle can't really plot against the LCA to define where the line from the tire contact intersects the CoG.

It seems to me the higher the front of the UCA, the more leverage the UCA has to roll the front up. The wider the spread between LCA and UCA on the chassis, the more the differential (pull on the UCA and push on the LCA) would roll the nose up. This is what I am trying to sort through. I'm trying to get my head around how much rotation force that spacing causes. It will help me understand the effect of moving each arm. I don't just want to move the arms willy-nilly, and my results don't track well with IC calculators or plots. I believe the lack of tracking is caused by the height spread between control arms on the chassis.
 

1. How does suspension affect a car's handling?

Suspension plays a crucial role in a car's handling by absorbing bumps and vibrations from the road, keeping the tires in contact with the ground, and maintaining stability and control during turns and maneuvers.

2. What are the components of a car's suspension?

The main components of a car's suspension include springs, shock absorbers or struts, control arms, and sway bars. These work together to support the weight of the car, absorb shocks, and provide a smooth and stable ride.

3. How often should a car's suspension be checked?

It is recommended to have your car's suspension checked every 50,000 miles or sooner if you notice any signs of wear or damage. Regular maintenance and inspections can help prevent costly repairs and ensure the safety and performance of your car.

4. What are the signs of a failing suspension?

Some common signs of a failing suspension include uneven tire wear, excessive bouncing or swaying while driving, a bumpy or uncomfortable ride, and unusual noises such as clunking or squeaking. If you notice any of these, it is important to have your suspension checked by a professional mechanic.

5. How can I improve my car's suspension?

There are several ways to improve a car's suspension, such as upgrading to high-performance shocks and struts, installing stiffer or adjustable springs, and adding sway bars or strut braces. However, it is important to consult with a professional and make sure any modifications are compatible with your car's make and model.

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
7K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
902
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
853
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Mechanics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top