I know that the generators of the Poncaire group that are associated with *orbital* angular momentum belong to an infinite dimensional representation, i.e.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

\begin{equation}

L = \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}

\end{equation}

Also the spin generators are associated with some finite dimensional representation of a lie algebra (such as the fundamental rep of SU(2) for spin 1/2 particles). Both of the groups commute with one another and should have their own symmetry charges.

Now my question is, in spin orbit coupling why is it L+S which is the conserved quantity and not L and S separately?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Symmetries and Spin orbit interaction

Loading...

Similar Threads - Symmetries Spin orbit | Date |
---|---|

I How does spin relate to the symmetry of a particle? | Feb 20, 2017 |

Spin-half mass term with symmetry breaking | Sep 25, 2013 |

About spin being an internal symmetry | Mar 6, 2013 |

Spin and symmetry | Jul 24, 2012 |

Spin-1/2 rotational symmetry | Feb 5, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**