Symplectic Condition For Canonical Transformation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the symplectic condition for a transformation to be canonical in classical mechanics, specifically addressing whether the condition MJM' = J holds for any matrix M or is restricted to symplectic matrices. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the symplectic condition MJM' = J is satisfied by any real matrix M, questioning how to verify if a transformation is canonical without using the Poisson Bracket condition.
  • Another participant challenges this conclusion, suggesting that the condition should be checked in the context of a simple 2D phase space.
  • A participant claims to have tested various matrices (2x2, 3x3, and 4x4) and found that they all satisfy the condition, proposing a proof for NXN matrices that supports their assertion.
  • In response, another participant clarifies that the symplectic condition specifically requires that the determinant of M equals 1 for 2D cases, indicating that not all real 2x2 matrices fulfill this requirement.
  • This participant provides the definition of the symplectic group and references the determinant condition for symplectic matrices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants disagree on whether the symplectic condition applies universally to all real matrices or is restricted to symplectic matrices with determinant 1. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader applicability of the condition.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights a potential misunderstanding regarding the properties of symplectic matrices and the specific requirements for a transformation to be considered canonical. The mathematical steps and definitions involved in the symplectic condition are not fully resolved.

CassiopeiaA
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I am reading Chapter 9 of Classical Mech by Goldstein.The symplectic condition for a transformation to be canonical is given as MJM' = J, where M' is transpose of M. I understood the derivation given in the book. But my question is : isn't this condition true for any matrix M? That is it doesn't matter whether we are talking about canonical transformation or not, any real matrix will satisfy the condition with the given J. And if so then how do I check if the given transformation is canonical without using the Poisson Bracket condition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you come to that conclusion? Why don't you check the condition for the most simple case of a 2D phase space?
 
vanhees71 said:
How do you come to that conclusion? Why don't you check the condition for the most simple case of a 2D phase space?
I took 2X2, 3X3 and 4X4 matrices with unknown variables and did the operation on them. All of them satisfied the condition. I also did a small proof for NXN matrix, that the above condition is true for any matrix.
 
Then there must be some misunderstanding on your part. Let's check the 2D case. By definition
$$J=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}.$$
Now let ##M \in \text{Sp}(2)##, i.e.,
$$M J M^T=J.$$
Set
$$M=\begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix}.$$
Then the condition for symplecticity is
$$ad-bc=\det{M} \stackrel{!}{=}1.$$
This means for the 2D case the symplectic matrices are the ##\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})## matrices, i.e., the matrices with determinant 1, and not all real ##2 \times 2## matrices fulfill this condition.

For more details see

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symplectic_group
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K