High School System of linear equations: When are we guaranteed a unique solution?

Click For Summary
A unique solution for a system of linear equations is guaranteed only when the matrix of coefficients is square and its determinant is non-zero. Even with an equal number of equations and unknowns, the system may have no solutions or infinitely many solutions if the matrix is not invertible. The presence of free variables indicates infinite solutions, particularly in infinite fields, while finite fields prevent this scenario. Consistency of the system is also crucial, as a system can have no solutions despite having free variables. The Kronecker-Capelli theorem states that a solution exists if the rank of the coefficient matrix equals the rank of the augmented matrix.
kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
I was reading about systems of linear equations. Even if we have the same number of unknowns and equations, we may still have infinitely many or no solutions. But if in addition to that the determinant of the matrix of coefficients does not vanish, then does it necessarily imply that we have a unique solution?

Surprisingly or not, I haven't found an answer to the above question.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02sc-multivariable-calculus-fall-2010/1.-vectors-and-matrices/part-b-matrices-and-systems-of-equations/session-14-solutions-to-square-systems/MIT18_02SC_MNotes_m3.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
For the system Ax = b with A\in\mathrm{Mat}_{m, n}(K), there are n-\mathrm{rank}(A) free variables. If K=\mathbb R (or any other infinite field), then having at least one variable free means there are infinitely many solutions. Also, a solution can be unique only if the matrix A is a square matrix (i.e only if number of variables = number of equations).

Of course, if the underlying field is finite, there can't be infinitely many solutions. That's something a lot of my students get wrong. They remember from school that if number of eqs is smaller than number of variables, then there are automatically infinitely many solutions. Not necessarily.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes kent davidge and StoneTemplePython
This is a nice answer, but I think you are thinking of the case b = the zero vector. I.e. probably you need to assume also the system is consistent. As you stated it, it seems, even with an infinite field and some free variables, if b ≠ zero, you only get either infinitely many, or no solutions. E.g. you could have the system x+y = 0, and x+y = 1, where the rank of the 2x2 matrix A is one, hence there is one free variable, but there is no solution at all, since the vector (0,1) does not lie in the image {(t,t): all t in K}, of the linear transformation.
 
Good point. The system Ax=b has a solution if and only if \mathrm{rank}(A) = \mathrm{rank}(A|b) by Kronecker-Capelli.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K