T or F? The prime field of R=Q[sqrt(2)] then Frac(R)=Reals

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertjordan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Prime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the assertion that if R = Q[sqrt(2)], then Frac(R) = R. Participants conclude that this statement is false, as Frac(R) is countable while the real numbers are uncountable. The fraction field Frac(R) consists of elements of the form { (a + b√2) / (c + d√2) | a, b, c, d ∈ Q }. A key point raised is the need to demonstrate the countability of Frac(R) to support the conclusion that it cannot equal the reals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of field theory, specifically prime fields and fraction fields.
  • Familiarity with the structure of Q[sqrt{2}] and its elements.
  • Knowledge of countability concepts in set theory.
  • Ability to work with rational numbers and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of fraction fields in algebraic structures.
  • Learn about countability and uncountability, focusing on Cantor's diagonal argument.
  • Research the Cantor pairing function and its applications in demonstrating bijections.
  • Explore the implications of countable versus uncountable sets in mathematical analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, algebraists, and anyone interested in field theory and set theory, particularly those exploring the properties of rational and real numbers.

robertjordan
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If R=\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}], then Frac(R)=\mathbb{R}

Homework Equations



\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]=\{a+b\sqrt{2} | a,b\in{\mathbb{Q}}\}
Frac(R) is the fraction field of R is basically \{\frac{a+b\sqrt{2}}{c+d\sqrt{2}} | a,b,c,d\in{\mathbb{Q}}\}.

The Attempt at a Solution


Back of the book says false...

I tried to show \pi\not\in{Frac(R)} by assuming by way of contradiction that there existed a,b,c,d\in{\mathbb{Q}} s.t. \frac{a+b\sqrt{2}}{c+d\sqrt{2}}=\pi.

That implies c\pi+d\pi\sqrt{2}=a+b\sqrt{2} ... this led nowhere :(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
robertjordan said:

Homework Statement



If R=\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}], then Frac(R)=\mathbb{R}

Homework Equations



\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]=\left{a+b\sqrt{2} | a,b\in{\mathbb{Q}}\right}
Frac(R) is the fraction field of R is basically \left{\frac{a+b\sqrt{2}}{c+d\sqrt{2}} | a,b,c,d\in{\mathbb{Q}}\right}.

The Attempt at a Solution


Back of the book says false...

I tried to show \pi\not\in{Frac(R)} by assuming by way of contradiction that there existed a,b,c,d\in{\mathbb{Q}} s.t. \frac{a+b\sqrt{2}}{c+d\sqrt{2}}=\pi.

That implies c\pi+d\pi\sqrt{2}=a+b\sqrt{2} ... this led nowhere :(

Frac(R) is countable, isn't it?
 
Dick said:
Frac(R) is countable, isn't it?

Thanks for the response.

If we could show Frac(R) is countable, we could conclude Frac(R)=/=reals because the reals are uncountable.

How can we show Frac(R) is countable? My friend said a way to show countability is to find a bijection between Frac(R) and the natural numbers...

Could we do something like this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor_pairing_function#Cantor_pairing_function?
 
robertjordan said:
Thanks for the response.

If we could show Frac(R) is countable, we could conclude Frac(R)=/=reals because the reals are uncountable.

How can we show Frac(R) is countable? My friend said a way to show countability is to find a bijection between Frac(R) and the natural numbers...

Could we do something like this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor_pairing_function#Cantor_pairing_function?

That's the basis of it. That shows that |NxN|=|N|. You don't need to directly construct the bijection. If you can show that if there is a map from a countable set ONTO Frac(R) then you know Frac(R) is countable. If you pick a tuple of four rational numbers (a,b,c,d) there an obvious way to map that to an element of Frac(R), right? So that's a mapping from QxQxQxQ -> Frac(R). Now you know Q is countable, right?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K