TA work mandatory for grad students?

[Nothing000]

Do grad students have to be TA's? Or can they just go to classes like undergrad students?

 

[Gokul43201]

If you're willing to pay your own tuition, you will not have to TA.

If you are in grad school for a PhD, you will sooner, rather than later, have to join a research group and work towards your dissertation.

 

[Integral]

Being a TA is an execellent learning experience which should not be missed by any Science or Math grad student.

 

[chroot]

In all truth, TAing can be a very rewarding and educational experience. If you intend on staying in academia, of course, you better get used to teaching.

- Warren

 

[Nothing000]

I deffinetely don't plan on staying in acedemia. I am an electrical engineering major. And I want to work in the industry. So do you guys think that TAing is as beneficial to engineering grad students as it is to science students?

 

[TMFKAN64]

Do grad students have to be TA's? Or can they just go to classes like undergrad students?

Actually, when I was a grad student many years ago (albeit not in physics), there was a requirement for every student to TA at least one class. This applied to students supported by the department as well as ones with external funding.

So the real answer is, it varies from school to school.

 

[J77]

And in the UK, you get paid for it.

Which is a bonus

 

[Nothing000]

How much do you get paid?

 

[J77]

Blimey - from memory...

Approximately: marking was 15 GBP per hour, supervision was a bit over 20, undergraduate lecture around 35 and postgrad around 50...

Like I say - from remembering back a good 5+ years now

 

[Gokul43201]

How much do you get paid?

In the US, a typical TA appointment covers tuition + a stipend of anywhere from $1000 to $2000 a month, depending on school and location. Or, as our administration informed us recently, the total amount spent on a TA is roughly $50 an hour.

 

[Doc Al]

Do grad students have to be TA's? Or can they just go to classes like undergrad students?

As stated, you don't have to be a TA if you've got the cash. (Though some schools wisely require it.) But I thought TAing was a blast--even though I had a fellowship, I still TA'd during summer sessions. I got to correct all the errors made by the profs.

Generally you will need to be a TA until you get picked up by a research group--then you're an RA and way too busy.

I strongly recommend against trying to avoid being a TA. It's important experience.

And, yes, you still have classes to attend!

 

[Cyrus]

As stated, you don't have to be a TA if you've got the cash. (Though some schools wisely require it.) But I thought TAing was a blast--even though I had a fellowship, I still TA'd during summer sessions. I got to correct all the errors made by the profs.

Generally you will need to be a TA until you get picked up by a research group--then you're an RA and way too busy.

I strongly recommend against trying to avoid being a TA. It's important experience.

And, yes, you still have classes to attend!

Really? At my school, grad students get full tuition if you are full time (for engineering). You don't have to be a TA. If you are a TA or do research, you get paid 24k a year (which is nothing considering that most companies pay for your school AND pay you full salary at 50-60k starting)...so the school is just trying to be SOMEWHAT competitive).

As for being a TA, I have no desire to become a teacher, and I am going to avoid being a TA at all costs. I would rather do research than waste time as a TA. When I was at work, they were looking for a new hire. The guy had little research experience but boasted he was a TA. The guy at work told him, were not looking to hire teachers here.

So, I would say it depends on what you want to do. Just keep the end picture in mind. I would do research over a TA, even if it is a great experience and 'fun.' But that is just my personal feelings on the issue.

I was talking to an advisor who told me if you do not find someone to do research with, you usually get stuck as a TA until you get assigned a professor to do your research with, and it might not be something your interested in.

I would rather work (and gain some experience in something tangible) and do school, than TA (which if you do not want to become a teacher, I do not see as being important to any employers) and do school, if I did not have research as an option.

 

[Nothing000]

When I was at work, they were looking for a new hire. The guy had little research experience but boasted he was a TA. The guy at work told him, were not looking to hire teachers here.

I would assume that is how employers outside of acedemia would look at it.

I would rather work and do school, than TA and do school if I did not have research as an option.

I completely agree. I don't ever plan on becoming a teacher or professor, so why not spend that time actually getting work experience.

 

[franznietzsche]

I would assume that is how employers outside of acedemia would look at it.



I completely agree. I don't ever plan on becoming a teacher or professor, so why not spend that time actually getting work experience.

Beacuse teaching material helps you learn it more thoroughly.

 

[Math Is Hard]

Beacuse teaching material helps you learn it more thoroughly.

That is so completely true. It's amazing how well you think you understand something... until you try to explain it to someone else!

 

[chroot]

On the other hand, with careers that closely parellel academia, like my own -- integrated circuit designer -- TA experience can be an asset.

Employees who know things, but lack the ability to clearly explain those things, are not worth much in a field like mine. What we need are people who are both knowledgeable, and capable of expressing themselves very clearly.

- Warren