Taking Calculus 3 first and then Physics Electromagentism?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the timing of taking Calculus 3 in relation to a physics course on electromagnetism. Participants explore whether prior knowledge of Calculus 3 is necessary for understanding the mathematical concepts involved in electromagnetism, particularly regarding integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if taking Calculus 3 before electromagnetism is advisable, noting the integration involved in electromagnetism.
  • Another participant suggests that for a typical freshman physics sequence, Calculus 3 may not be necessary beforehand, as integrals used are often trivial and mainly conceptual.
  • This same participant emphasizes that the necessity of Calculus 3 could depend on the specific course level and textbook used, hinting at a potential difference in requirements for junior/senior level courses.
  • A different participant shares their experience of taking both courses simultaneously, indicating that it did not significantly impact their understanding, with a belief that Calculus 2 was more beneficial.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of Calculus 3 before taking electromagnetism, with some suggesting it may not be essential while others highlight the potential benefits depending on the course level.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve whether Calculus 3 is definitively required, and it remains unclear how different educational institutions may approach the integration topics in electromagnetism.

Toranc3
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
I have already completed Calculus 1 and 2 but I was wondering if it would be a better idea to take calculus 3 first and then physics electromagnetism. I know that electromagnetism deals with a lot of integration but does it deal with double and triple integrals? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it's the second semester of a typical "freshman physics" sequence, you probably don't need Calc 3 beforehand. You will use line, surface and volume integrals, but mainly for conceptual purposes. In most examples and problems, the integrals will be trivial from a mathematical point of view. This may vary from one school to another, so if you're really worried, talk to the instructor about it beforehand.

If it's a junior/senior level E&M course using, say, Griffiths as a textbook, on the other hand...
 
jtbell said:
If it's the second semester of a typical "freshman physics" sequence, you probably don't need Calc 3 beforehand. You will use line, surface and volume integrals, but mainly for conceptual purposes. In most examples and problems, the integrals will be trivial from a mathematical point of view. This may vary from one school to another, so if you're really worried, talk to the instructor about it beforehand.

If it's a junior/senior level E&M course using, say, Griffiths as a textbook, on the other hand...

Thanks for the reply.
 
I think i took them at the same time and it didnt seem to hurt or help. I recall calc 2 being much more helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K