Taking the inverse laplace of this?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Marshillboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Laplace
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on taking the inverse Laplace transform of the expression (-4s-1)/(4s^2 + s + 4), which is part of a piecewise-defined second-order differential equation. The user suggests separating the expression into two fractions to simplify the process. The resulting fractions are (-s)/((s+1/8)² + 63/64) and (-1/4)/((s+1/8)² + 63/64). The second fraction can be easily transformed using the e^(at) sin(bt) identity, while the first requires consulting standard Laplace transform tables for resolution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with inverse Laplace transform techniques
  • Knowledge of differential equations, particularly second-order equations
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions, including completing the square
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inverse Laplace transforms in detail
  • Learn how to apply the e^(at) sin(bt) identity in inverse Laplace transformations
  • Explore standard Laplace transform tables for common functions
  • Practice solving piecewise-defined differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, mathematics, and physics who are working with differential equations and require a solid understanding of Laplace transforms for analysis and problem-solving.

Marshillboy
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
How do I take the inverse laplace transform of something that looks like this? It's part of a larger piecewise-defined second order differential equation, but this is the part I'm stuck on.

(-4s-1)/(4s^2 + s + 4)

Completing the square doesn't work for the bottom, so I figure I need to separate the whole thing into two separate fractions. I still can't figure out how to take the inverse laplace of either resulting fraction, however.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can simplify the numerator by breaking across the difference, using the rule \frac{a+b}{c}=\frac{a}{c}+\frac{b}{c}.

For the denominator, just looking at it I can't see why you can't complete the square, if I'm wrong, please show us why.

Also, if you come to something in your steps that you're not sure how to take the inverse Laplace of, show us, we might be able to give an idea.
 
I see.

So, doing so would give me

\frac{-s}{(s+1/8)^{2}+63/64}+\frac{-1/4}{(s+1/8)^{2}+63/64}

The second fraction would be simple to use with the e^{at} sin(bt) identity since it's just a coeffecient on top, but what about the first?
 
This is just standard look up tables, look it up on wikipedia.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K