Inverse Laplace transform with p^-1 and exponential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenge of performing an inverse Laplace transform involving the term p^-1 and an exponential function. The user is attempting to manipulate the expression u^2/4D^2 to align with standard inverse Laplace transform tables but is struggling with the square root component. The consensus suggests that numerical inversion may be the only viable solution for this particular problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inverse Laplace transforms
  • Familiarity with exponential functions in mathematical analysis
  • Knowledge of standard Laplace transform tables
  • Basic skills in numerical methods for function inversion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inverse Laplace transforms
  • Learn numerical methods for function inversion, such as the Talbot method
  • Explore advanced techniques in manipulating algebraic expressions for Laplace transforms
  • Review standard Laplace transform tables for common functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and students involved in applied mathematics or control theory who are working with Laplace transforms and require assistance in performing inverse transformations.

kewei chen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I have spend whole day but still not figure out an inverse Laplace transform. Hope someone can help me. The question is in the attachment. I'm trying to extract u^2/4D^2 out the bracket to match the standard inverse table, but it seems difficult to deal with the square root. Thanks and appreciate.
 

Attachments

  • question.jpg
    question.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 870
  • table.jpg
    table.jpg
    41.4 KB · Views: 10,643
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
I don't know how the author did the inverse transform. It seems numerical inversion is the only way I can use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K