Tangential and Normal of a rotating mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the tangential and normal acceleration of a rotating mass, specifically focusing on the relationships between angular velocity, radius, and linear velocity in a rotational motion context.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculations for tangential and normal acceleration, questioning unit consistency and the interpretation of given values. There is an attempt to clarify the relationship between angular acceleration and linear velocity.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided some guidance on unit corrections and the interpretation of the problem statement. There is acknowledgment of a modification in the problem's parameters, leading to further clarification of the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted discrepancy in the units provided in the problem statement, with a change from feet to meters, which has implications for the calculations being discussed.

nysnacc
Messages
184
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


14.76.PNG


Homework Equations


at = Rα
an = V2/ R = Rω2

Vt
Vn =0

The Attempt at a Solution


I found at=0
an=5.66 m/s
vt=3.364
vn=0


So v = vt = 3.364 m/s[/B]
Correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nysnacc said:
an=5.66 m/s
If you correct the units, yes.
nysnacc said:
vt=3.364
Please show how you got that.
 
oh yes, a in m/s^2 typo :)

for vt, first, I need ω, which is found from an = v^2/R where R is L sinθ

SO, v = sqrt (an*R) = sqrt (5.66*4sin30°) = 3.36 m/s
 
nysnacc said:
SO, v = sqrt (an*R) = sqrt (5.66*4sin30°) = 3.36 m/s
What are the units associated with that 4 (highlighted in red)?
 
4 in meter, which is the length of L
 
the question is modified, it was shown 4 ft but actually it should be in meter.
 
nysnacc said:
4 in meter, which is the length of L
nysnacc said:
the question is modified, it was shown 4 ft but actually it should be in meter.
Ah. It would have been nice to have been made aware of this detail in the problem statement o_O

In that case your tangential velocity looks okay.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nysnacc
Hopefully I wouldn't make the same mistake next time, thanks for pointing out :)

And at = 0 (rotating in constant angular speed), vn = 0 (constant radius R) correct?
 
nysnacc said:
And at = 0 (rotating in constant angular speed), vn = 0 (constant radius R) correct?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nysnacc
  • #10
gneill said:
Yes.
Great! Actually these questions appeared on my midterm today, and these were my answers
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K