Tension & Circular Motion Question - Looking for speed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the application of the centripetal acceleration formula, a = v²/r, in solving a tension and circular motion problem. Participants confirm that the interpretation of the question is correct, but highlight that the final numerical calculation was erroneous due to the calculator being set to radians instead of degrees. Additionally, they emphasize the importance of correctly handling negative signs in calculations involving gravitational acceleration, specifically -9.80 m/s².

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal acceleration and its formula, a = v²/r
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration, specifically -9.80 m/s²
  • Ability to switch between radians and degrees in calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of centripetal motion and acceleration
  • Learn how to convert between radians and degrees in calculations
  • Study the implications of negative signs in physics equations
  • Practice solving tension problems in circular motion scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of common calculation pitfalls in circular motion problems.

dcmf
Messages
16
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
A person sitting in a chair (combined mass 80 kg) is attached to a 6.0-m-long cable. The person moves in a horizontal circle. The cable angle θ is 62 degrees below the horizontal. What is the person's speed? Note: The radius of the circle is not 6.0 m.
Relevant Equations
a = v^2/r
I have attached a screenshot of my rough work. First of all, is my interpretation of the question correct? Please see the diagram in purple. To me, this makes sense because a=v^2/r is the only equation from my coursework that seems to relates radius (which you can find from the length of the cable) and speed.
1707605967159.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @dcmf,
:welcome:

dcmf said:
is my interpretation of the question correct?
I guess so. Apparently the person is not in a wheelchair going around slowly ?

What do you do with the minus sign ?
And when I do the calculation, I get a different answer.

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dcmf
Welcome, @dcmf !

All the steps seem to be correct, but the final numerical calculation is incorrect.
As Tx and Ty are directly proportional to the horizontal and vertical accelerations respectively, you could have used those values directly.

##tan~28=ac/g##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dcmf
Hi all, thank you for your replies. When you both said you're getting a different number doing the same calculation, I realized my calculator has been in radians and not degrees this entire time 🤡

Thanks for your patience and help :')
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban, PhDeezNutz and BvU
dcmf said:
my calculator has been in radians and not degrees
Happens often (and to all of us :wink:). Reason the more to check things, e.g. ##\sin(28^\circ)\approx 0.5## -- so you learn to smell a rat if you get ##0.27##

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Screen Shot 2024-02-10 at 7.11.41 PM.png

How did you handle the negative sign under the radical? You can't simply ignore it because it shouldn't be there. Think about this because you might will get into trouble if you replace ##g## with ##-9.80~\text{m/s}^2## indiscriminately.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
984
Replies
21
Views
908
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K