Tension & Circular Motion Question - Looking for speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a tension and circular motion problem, where the original poster seeks confirmation on their interpretation of the question and calculations. They utilize the equation a = v²/r, relating radius and speed, but encounter discrepancies in their final numerical answer. Other participants confirm that while the steps are correct, the poster's calculator was set to radians instead of degrees, leading to errors. Additionally, there is a caution about handling negative signs in calculations, emphasizing the importance of accuracy in physics problems. Overall, the conversation highlights common pitfalls in physics calculations and the importance of double-checking settings and signs.
dcmf
Messages
16
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
A person sitting in a chair (combined mass 80 kg) is attached to a 6.0-m-long cable. The person moves in a horizontal circle. The cable angle θ is 62 degrees below the horizontal. What is the person's speed? Note: The radius of the circle is not 6.0 m.
Relevant Equations
a = v^2/r
I have attached a screenshot of my rough work. First of all, is my interpretation of the question correct? Please see the diagram in purple. To me, this makes sense because a=v^2/r is the only equation from my coursework that seems to relates radius (which you can find from the length of the cable) and speed.
1707605967159.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @dcmf,
:welcome:

dcmf said:
is my interpretation of the question correct?
I guess so. Apparently the person is not in a wheelchair going around slowly ?

What do you do with the minus sign ?
And when I do the calculation, I get a different answer.

##\ ##
 
Welcome, @dcmf !

All the steps seem to be correct, but the final numerical calculation is incorrect.
As Tx and Ty are directly proportional to the horizontal and vertical accelerations respectively, you could have used those values directly.

##tan~28=ac/g##
 
Hi all, thank you for your replies. When you both said you're getting a different number doing the same calculation, I realized my calculator has been in radians and not degrees this entire time 🤡

Thanks for your patience and help :')
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, PhDeezNutz and BvU
dcmf said:
my calculator has been in radians and not degrees
Happens often (and to all of us :wink:). Reason the more to check things, e.g. ##\sin(28^\circ)\approx 0.5## -- so you learn to smell a rat if you get ##0.27##

##\ ##
 
Screen Shot 2024-02-10 at 7.11.41 PM.png

How did you handle the negative sign under the radical? You can't simply ignore it because it shouldn't be there. Think about this because you might will get into trouble if you replace ##g## with ##-9.80~\text{m/s}^2## indiscriminately.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top