Tensor Operators: Find an Accessible Textbook & Explanations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jolb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Tensor
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the difficulty of understanding tensor operators, particularly in the context of a course using Shankar's textbook. The original poster seeks a more accessible resource that covers the basics of tensors without assuming prior knowledge. Suggestions include Sakurai's textbook, which provides a clearer explanation of tensor operators and specific examples, such as constructing a spherical tensor operator of rank 2. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the tensor product of vectors and how it relates to angular momentum. Overall, finding a suitable textbook or resource is crucial for mastering tensor operators.
Jolb
Messages
417
Reaction score
29
I'm taking a course that's taught out of Shankar, and I'm going to be tested on Tensor Operators, which is 15.3, p.417-421 in Shankar. I've never actually worked with tensors before (except the Maxwell stress tensor in EM), and I find that section too hard to understand.

Does anyone know of a more accessible treatment of tensor operators in another textbook? Particularly one that covers basics about tensors instead of assuming some prior exposure. (Tensor operators are way beyond my go-to book, Griffiths.) Here is an example of a problem I'm supposed to be able to do but I'm absolutely lost:

Construct a spherical tensor operator of rank 2 from the components of the Cartesian tensor operator Tjk=xjxk.

I would really appreciate any suggestions, or even explanations if you feel generous enough to explain tensor operators.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sakurai explains how to do this, and you can get by with Griffith's quantum mechanics book to do this. In Sakurai they work your specific example of a dyad. To get some idea how this works all you need to know is how to expand the tensor product of two vectors in terms of a direct sum. That is formula 4.186 in Griffifths quantum mechanics book |j_1,m_1>\otimes|j_2,m_2>=\sum <j_1 j_2 ; m_1 m_2|j_1 j _2 ; j m>|j,m>

So we have something like U_iV_j|1,i>\otimes|1,j>

We know by the triangle rule of adding angular momentum that where going to get a 2, 1, and 0. That is a rank 2 tensor a vector and a scalar. This just means that the tensor product of two vectors breaks down into the direct sum of a scalar, vector, and a rank 2 tensor. Let's see how this works explicitly. Consider, U_1V_-1|1,1>\otimes|1,-1> Using the Clebsch Gordon formula we get that U_1V_-1|1,1>\otimes|1,-1>=U_1V_-1(1/\sqrt{6}|2,0>+1/\sqrt{2}|1,0>+1/\sqrt{3}|0,0>) Working through all the combos of U and V you can see what goes where and you can check your answer in Sakurai page 236
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K