Terminal Velocity of a Concrete Sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the terminal velocity of a concrete sphere shaped like a baseball, including the distance required to reach that velocity when dropped under normal Earth conditions. Participants provide details about the sphere's mass, radius, and cross-sectional area, as well as relevant physical constants such as gravitational acceleration and air density.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the estimation of the drag coefficient for the concrete sphere, with suggestions to use experimental values or approximations from similar objects. There is also mention of the challenges in determining the distance to reach terminal velocity and the complexities involved in the calculations, including the need for differential equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on potential drag coefficient values and numerical methods for approximating the motion of the sphere. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of air resistance on the calculations, with no explicit consensus reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the sphere may not reach terminal velocity due to the height from which it is dropped, and there are discussions about the limitations of certain equations when considering air resistance.

Yander
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to find the approximate terminal velocity of a baseball shaped concrete sphere and what distance it would take to reach that terminal velocity if dropped on Earth under normal weather conditions.

I have found that a baseball made of concrete would have a mass of approximately .5307 kg, radius of 1.46 inches and a cross sectional area of .004321 m^2

I know that the acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s^2
and according to wikipedia the air density of dry air at sea level at 20 degress celsius is 1.2 kg/m^3

Using wikipedia I found the equation for the terminal velocity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocity"

I am having trouble finding the approximate drag coefficient of the concrete sphere. Is there anyway to estimate this to get a reasonably close value, or must it be derived experimentally?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sure I've seen this question before and I'm sure drag coeffecients are worked out experimentally, ie in wind tunnels. You might be lucky and stumble across an object that is fairly close to a concrete sphere from which you could approximate as this is a fairly simple object, but AFAIK there is no good value without experiment, so what your looking for is for someone to have done the work before.

My advice take a drag coefficient of something like a concrete baseball, then apply that, and mention that this is not the exact value, but should produce a fairly reliable result.

EDIT: I found the drag coeffeicent for a rough sphere is 0.4. After a bit of rooting around.

This will probably suffice?

http://aerodyn.org/Drag/tables.html

Table is here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Schrödinger's Dog said:
I'm sure I've seen this question before and I'm sure drag coeffecients are worked out experimentally, ie in wind tunnels. You might be lucky and stumble across an object that is fairly close to a concrete sphere from which you could approximate as this is a fairly simple object, but AFAIK there is no good value without experiment, so what your looking for is for someone to have done the work before.

My advice take a drag coefficient of something like a concrete baseball, then apply that, and mention that this is not the exact value, but should produce a fairly reliable result.

EDIT: I found the drag coeffeicent for a rough sphere is 0.4. After a bit of rooting around.

This will probably suffice?

http://aerodyn.org/Drag/tables.html

Table is here.

Thanks a lot! I'm sure it will suffice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, I agree 0.4 sounds good for the drag coefficient, that will get you the terminal velocity, but it is another matter to determine in what distance the ball will reach that velocity. Firstly, it is never reached, only approached, so you might want to consider the distance it takes to reach say 95% of terminal velocity. Secondly, you've got to be good at differential equations (at least better than me) in order to arrive at the solution, because acceleration will be variable due to the variable drag force which is a function of the square of the speed which is continually changing during decent.
 
Try a numerical solution first, just to give you an answer to check.
Using a spreadsheet (or your favorite language) calculate the acceleration and speed every say 0.1sec and draw a graph of that.
 
Thanks, that website is awesome. Can someone tell me what the exp means in the impact and velocity equations.

It turns out the concrete sphere fell from a height low enough that it never reached terminal velocity. When I was first calculating the time and velocity at various heights I used the wrong equation but want to now if my logic made sense. I set the height equal to the integral of 9.8t from 0 to x, and solved for x.
h = \int_{0}^{x} (9.8t)dt
 
Last edited:
Yander said:
Can someone tell me what the exp means in the impact and velocity equations.
Exponent?
e^{x}
 
Yander said:
Thanks, that website is awesome. Can someone tell me what the exp means in the impact and velocity equations.

It turns out the concrete sphere fell from a height low enough that it never reached terminal velocity. When I was first calculating the time and velocity at various heights I used the wrong equation but want to now if my logic made sense. I set the height equal to the integral of 9.8t from 0 to x, and solved for x.
h = \int_{0}^{x} (9.8t)dt
Your integral (from 0 to t, not x) applies only to free fall with a constant acceleration of g=9.8m/s/s, no air resistance, and boils down to h =1/2gt^2for a body falling from rest. You cannot use that equation for the air resistance case, since the acceleration is not constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
25K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K