Terraforming Mars: Possibility or Pipe Dream?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter juanitosguitar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mars Terraforming
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of terraforming Mars, exploring various methods and implications of such a project. Participants consider both the scientific and ethical dimensions of terraforming, as well as the time scales involved in potentially transforming the Martian environment to support human life.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the appropriateness of the topic for the assignments, suggesting that a survey may not yield useful data for a physics paper.
  • Another participant raises ethical concerns regarding the implications of terraforming, referencing potential existing life on Mars.
  • Several participants discuss the time required to oxygenate Mars, with one noting that it took Earth over a billion years to achieve its current atmospheric conditions.
  • Some participants propose that engineering could potentially speed up the process of oxygen production, but skepticism remains about achieving this within a human time scale.
  • There is a discussion about the feasibility of using engineered organisms to produce oxygen, with one participant arguing that this would require a significant increase in efficiency compared to natural processes.
  • Another participant calculates the theoretical oxygen production rate from algae on Mars, suggesting it could be done in a very short time if conditions were ideal, but acknowledges practical challenges in implementation.
  • Concerns are raised about the availability of water on Mars and whether it would be sufficient for the required oxygen production.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and ethics of terraforming Mars, with no consensus reached. Some agree on the challenges posed by time scales and resource availability, while others propose various methods and express optimism about engineering solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions about the efficiency of oxygen production and the availability of resources on Mars. The discussion also touches on the historical context of Earth's atmospheric development and the implications of introducing engineered organisms to a new environment.

juanitosguitar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I am doing a project for two of my classes, technical writing and Unifying Concepts in Physics. I am researching the feasibility of terraforming Mars to present for my final presentation. I need to present some quantitative data by putting out a survey, so here are two questions I'd like to ask:

1. Do you think it is possible to terraform Mars?

2. If so, what method would you propose to do so?

I'd appreciate any help y'all can give me. I look forward to reading your responses in search for new ideas.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Have you discussed whether or not this is an appropriate topic with your tutor? The terraforming of a planet is an incredibly speculative mega-mega-project, how does it relate to "Unifying Concepts"?

Also if this is a technical writing assignment then surveys asking people if X is possible isn't the best dataset for a physics paper. Hard data detailing the geological, climatic and ecological differences between the worlds and the quantity of resources needed to decrease that disparity would seem more appropriate. Have you been told you specifically need a survey?
 
Whenever discussions of terraforming come up, I like to point out that it took over 1 billion years to oxygenate the Earth's atmosphere. Imagine the Earth's oceans full of green algae cranking out oxygen as fast as they can, and it still took a billion years. When you ask if it is possible to terraform Mars, how long are you willing to wait.? A billion years? No? OK, let's speed it up by a factor of 1000. A million years? Still too long? Generating a planetary quantity of a gas like oxygen in a humanly reasonable time scale looks all but impossible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2 and berkeman
The algae didn't have "creating an oxygen atmosphere" as goal. They produced some oxygen as by-product. Terraforming would design bacteria to release as much oxygen as possible, a completely different situation.
 
mfb said:
The algae didn't have "creating an oxygen atmosphere" as goal. They produced some oxygen as by-product. Terraforming would design bacteria to release as much oxygen as possible, a completely different situation.

Sure. But if you wanted to do it in, say 1000 years, you would have to design algae that were 1 million times better at producing oxygen. This seems very unlikely.
 
phyzguy said:
Sure. But if you wanted to do it in, say 1000 years, you would have to design algae that were 1 million times better at producing oxygen. This seems very unlikely.
We produce insulin in E.coli, a bacterium with a natural insulin production rate of exactly zero. The increase rate is undefined.

The algae did not have any evolutionary advantage from emitting oxygen - "better" does not make sense in that context. Oxygen was simply a waste product.
 
A great place to start in leaning to teraform Mars would be to learn to maintain the system we have. As long as we cannot even maintain a working eco system how in the world could we ever expect to create one?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2 and berkeman
mfb said:
We produce insulin in E.coli, a bacterium with a natural insulin production rate of exactly zero. The increase rate is undefined.

Even an infinite oxygen production rate could be insufficient. Is there enough water on Mars to produce the required amount of oxygen for a breathable atmosphere? If not, than photosynthesis is no option at all.

[edit]I just answered the question by myself: With 5770 kg/m² oxygen in Mars the O2 partial pressure would be the same as on Earth. The bioproduction of this amount of oxygen would require at least 3250 kg/m² water. According to current estimations there are 11000 kg/m² water available on the surface of Mars. That means it could work in principle (assuming we have the required organisms).[/edit]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
phyzguy said:
Whenever discussions of terraforming come up, I like to point out that it took over 1 billion years to oxygenate the Earth's atmosphere. Imagine the Earth's oceans full of green algae cranking out oxygen as fast as they can, and it still took a billion years. When you ask if it is possible to terraform Mars, how long are you willing to wait.? A billion years? No? OK, let's speed it up by a factor of 1000. A million years? Still too long? Generating a planetary quantity of a gas like oxygen in a humanly reasonable time scale looks all but impossible.
Sounds like this also includes the origin of life and evolution of the organisms that generated the oxygen.
Without the initial steps it could be much faster.
 
  • #11
BillTre said:
Sounds like this also includes the origin of life and evolution of the organisms that generated the oxygen.
Without the initial steps it could be much faster.

I don't think so. Even after the appearance of photosynthesizing organisms, it took several billion years for oxygen to accumulate to current levels. See this wiki article. I'm sure it could be sped up with engineering and so on, I just doubt it could be sped up enough to happen on a human time scale of hundreds to thousands of years.
 
  • #12
OK.
Seems filling the oxygen sinks took a while before the atmosphere was much affected.
 
  • #13
Like the oceans?

Rough estimate: Splitting water to oxygen and hydrogen (which is not what algae do, but I don't care about a factor 2 here) need 16 kJ per gram H2O, or 18 kJ per gram of O2. This old paper has algae that can use ~10% of the input light for oxygen production (table 2).

Total sunlight hitting Mars is 20 PW, if we can use it fully for algae we get 22 million tons of oxygen per second. 5770 kg/m² multiplied by the surface area of Mars is 8.3*1014 tons. At the calculated rate, we need ...

... 1.2 years.

We don't have a method to cover the whole surface in a thick layer of algae and the surface will absorb some oxygen, but the 10% of the 1969 paper is certainly not the best possible result, and no plan wants to be done in 1.2 years.

Edit: http://nautil.us/issue/43/heroes/make-mars-great-again from a planetary scientist with a 100-year estimate for temperature and a bit more for oxygen.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Closed pending moderation
 
  • #15
Well, it looks like this 1-post newbie was looking for help cheating on his homework and we obliged. Doh! Thread will remain closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
13K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K