Test question: What is true for a mechanical impact?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the principles of mechanical impact, specifically focusing on the conservation of energy and momentum during collisions. The original poster is examining a multiple-choice question regarding the applicability of these principles in different types of collisions, including elastic and inelastic scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the validity of using conservation laws in elastic versus inelastic collisions, questioning why certain statements about energy conservation are true or false. The original poster expresses confusion about the application of these principles and whether knowing the masses of the objects is crucial.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided insights into the limitations of applying conservation laws in inelastic collisions, with some emphasizing that mechanical energy is not conserved in such cases. There is an ongoing exploration of how energy is transformed during impacts, and practical examples are shared to illustrate these concepts.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions of elastic and inelastic collisions, as well as the implications of the coefficient of restitution. The discussion also touches on the importance of understanding energy transformations during collisions and the conditions under which conservation laws can be applied.

bremenfallturm
Messages
81
Reaction score
13
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
TL;DR Summary: I'm trying to figure out why this answer is not correct for a mechanical impact:
"Conservation of energy and conservation of momentum can be used to find the relative velocities after the impact"

Hi! I have a multiple choice test that asks:

What applies to a mechanical impact?
a) The total kinetic energy is always preserved if the coefficient of restitution e>0.
b) The momentum is preserved, except when the impact is ideally plastic (e=0).
c) Both objects stop if the impact is ideally elastic.
d) The coefficient of restitution can be used to determine the relative velocities after the impact.
e) Both objects stop if the impact is ideally plastic.
f) The law of conservation of energy and the law of momentum can be used to determine the relative velocities after the impact.

d) is the correct answer, which does make sense, but I have used f) to solve problems relating to impact before.
I know that we can not use these laws during the impact, but setting them up before the impact and after should work? Is the key here that you have to know the masses of the objects, or what's the matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f is only true for elastic collisions
 
Orodruin said:
f is only true for elastic collisions
Ah, why doesn't it work in the second case? If we apply it to the whole system, can't we still use those relations even with an inelastic collision?
 
bremenfallturm said:
Ah, why doesn't it work in the second case? If we apply it to the whole system, can't we still use those relations even with an inelastic collision?
By definition, mechanical energy is not conserved in an inelastic collision.
 
bremenfallturm said:
If we apply it to the whole system, can't we still use those relations even with an inelastic collision?
You can use total energy conservation with an inelastic collision if, in addition to the initial velocities ##v_{1i}## and ##v_{2i}##, you are given the amount of mechanical energy ##\Delta E## lost in the collision. Then you can write $$ \begin{align} m_1v_{1i}+m_2v_{2i} & =m_1v_{1f}+m_2v_{2f} \nonumber \\
\frac{1}{2} m_1v_{1i}^2+\frac{1}{2}m_2v_{2i}^2 & =\frac{1}{2}m_1v_{1f}^2+\frac{1}{2}m_2v_{2f}^2+\Delta E \nonumber \end{align}$$and solve the system of two equations and two unknowns ##v_{1f}## and ##v_{2f}##.
 
bremenfallturm said:
Ah, why doesn't it work in the second case? If we apply it to the whole system, can't we still use those relations even with an inelastic collision?
No. Mechanical energy is not conserved. Some of the mechanical energy is converted to internal energy, as described by the 1st Law of Thermodynamics.
 
bremenfallturm said:
Ah, why doesn't it work in the second case? If we apply it to the whole system, can't we still use those relations even with an inelastic collision?
Just a practical everyday occurrence:
Two crashing vehicles don’t normally keep their original shapes after the impact or collision.
That “reshaping body work” takes certain amount of energy from the initial mechanical energy of the system, which is associated to the masses and their individual velocities.
As the mass within the system does not change, the final individual velocities must be reduced, just like the final mechanical energy is.
 
Thank you everybody for your input! I also re-read the section on impact in one of my mechanics books that stated that kinetic energy is not preserved after impact.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Lnewqban

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K