Tetrachromats see more colors than trichromats

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pythagorean
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of tetrachromacy, particularly in women, and its implications for color perception compared to trichromats. Participants explore the potential for tetrachromats to perceive a wider range of colors and the subjective nature of color experience.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that tetrachromats may experience a significantly broader spectrum of colors, potentially seeing up to a hundred million colors.
  • Others argue that the additional hues perceived by tetrachromats might be concentrated in a narrow range, particularly around yellowy-orange, rather than distributed across the entire color spectrum.
  • A participant mentions anecdotal evidence regarding the difficulties some individuals have in distinguishing certain colors, which may relate to differences in color perception.
  • One participant expresses a desire for tetrachromacy, framing it as an unfair advantage in color perception.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the additional colors perceived by tetrachromats, with no consensus on whether these colors are broadly distributed or concentrated in specific areas of the spectrum.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on anecdotal evidence and non-peer-reviewed sources, which may limit the robustness of the arguments presented.

Pythagorean
Science Advisor
Messages
4,430
Reaction score
327
Apparently, women can have a fourth cone that allows them to see a greater diversity of colors...?

Living among us are people with four cones, who might experience a range of colors invisible to the rest. It’s possible these so-called tetrachromats see a hundred million colors, with each familiar hue fracturing into a hundred more subtle shades for which there are no names, no paint swatches. And because perceiving color is a personal experience, they would have no way of knowing they see far beyond what we consider the limits of human vision.

non-peer-reviewed article:

http://discovermagazine.com/2012/jul-aug/06-humans-with-super-human-vision/article_view?b_start:int=0&-C=
 
Biology news on Phys.org
...with each familiar hue fracturing into a hundred more subtle shades...

This bit probably isn't right. All the extra hues would be expected to be crammed into a narrow range because the doubled-up pigment varients are so close to each other. So it would be like seeing many more hues of yellowy-orange rather than extra hues across the whole colour spectrum.

At least one of the women in the earlier tests about 10 years ago, who was keen on tapestry, complained she could never find the right shades of orange yarn because manufacturers left great gaps in this part of the spectrum.
 
This may help to explain why so many of my xy friends can't tell maize from sunglow.
 
This is patently unfair and sexist! I want 4 cones!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K