The 1904 plane of the Wright Brothers a bit strange

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the mechanics of the Wright Brothers' 1904 plane, Flyer II, specifically regarding its takeoff dynamics and the relationship between thrust, drag, and wind speed. Participants explore mathematical models and interpretations of historical letters to clarify how the plane achieved flight under varying conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a mathematical model to explain the takeoff mechanics of Flyer II, noting that thrust was less than drag at speeds below 27-28 mph, raising questions about how the plane could accelerate to takeoff speed.
  • Another participant suggests that the relationship between thrust and drag may be misunderstood, proposing that thrust could initially exceed drag until reaching a maximum velocity where both forces equalize.
  • A different viewpoint posits that the plane's performance could be influenced by the angle of attack, which might change under different wind conditions, affecting lift and drag.
  • Concerns are raised about the apparent contradiction in Wilbur Wright's letters regarding ground speed and wind speed, questioning how a 5 ft/sec increase in wind could lead to a 9 ft/sec increase in ground speed.
  • Some participants speculate that the statements in the letters might reflect a misunderstanding or misuse of terms related to lift and drag ratios rather than a straightforward thrust-drag relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the Wright Brothers' statements and the underlying physics, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a consensus on the mechanics of Flyer II's takeoff.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the available data, including potential misinterpretations of historical letters and the need for clearer definitions of terms related to thrust, drag, and lift-to-drag ratios.

  • #31
Ok, that's enough. It's clear that you aren't looking to learn aerodynamics but rather are looking for fuel for conspiracy theory. We don't do conspiracy theory here. Thread locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K