A "The 7 Strangest Coincidences in the Laws of Nature" (S. Hossenfelder)

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter mitchell porter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology Particle
  • #51
Vanadium 50 said:
Everybody knows that's because there are π×107 seconds in a year.
Once a friend of mine, who considered math to be some kind of "intellectual martial art",
began an attack with :
"What is bigger, ##\pi^2## or ##2^{\pi}## ?"
##2^{\pi} \lt g \approx \pi^2##
"Prove it ! - no calculator "
Hahaha ... It's useful though
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Mister T said:
##\pi \approx \sqrt{3}+\sqrt{2}##
The true value of ##\pi## equals the diagonal of a unit cube plus the diagonal of a unit square. The rest of the world has it wrong. The value of ##\pi## in common usage is wrong because it's based on unit circles instead of unit cubes. There's a lot more to it. It was all explained to me but I didn't understand. I just stated that it was the diagonal of a unit cube plus the diagonal of a unit square.

The response was "Well, yeah". As if it were an obvious conclusion to the gibberish I'd just heard.
 
  • #53
sbrothy said:
And I’m sure I’m supposed to believe that you picked the number 42 out of thin air, am I right? :)
Yes. Pure coincidence :P
 
  • #54
Mister T said:
##\pi \approx \sqrt{3}+\sqrt{2}##
If that was exact, you would bound to say:"WTF?!".
 
  • #55
billtodd said:
If that was exact, you would bound to say:"WTF?!".
How could it be! One is trancendental and the other is not.
 
  • #56
Maybe it is exact and everybody else is using the wrong value!
 
  • #57
martinbn said:
How could it be! One is trancendental and the other is not.
Actually both sides are transcendental numbers.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes gentzen
  • #58
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and billtodd
  • #59
martinbn said:
##\sqrt3+\sqrt2## is not.
Yes, it's algebraic. ##x=\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}## ##x^2=5+2\sqrt{6}##, and then again: ##(x^2-5)^2-24=p(x)##, this is a polynomial that has this number its one of its roots, thus it's algebraic. ##\pi## can't be a root to a polynomial with rational coefficients.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and ohwilleke
  • #60
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #61
martinbn said:
How could it be! One is trancendental and the other is not.
I have a question to you.
Can a Transcendental number to the power of algebraic number be a Trascendental number?

For example take ##e^{\varphi}##, where ##\varphi## is the golden number solution to ##x^2+x+1=0##, how would one prove that it's transcendental?

Can ##\pi## be a Transcendental number raise to the power of an algebraic number?

That would be interesting if it's possible, and if it's not then I would welcome a proof/argument why it's not.
 
  • #62
billtodd said:
Can π be a Transcendental number raise to the power of an algebraic number?
π = π1.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and berkeman
  • #63
Looks like its that time again. This thread has run its transcendental course back to itself and so its a good time to close it.

Thank you all for contributing here.

Jedi
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
Back
Top