High School The Addition of Two Vectors: A Visual Guide

Click For Summary
The discussion explains how the addition of two vectors is visually represented and why their sum lies between them. It uses the analogy of hitting a ball to illustrate that when forces act in opposite directions, the resultant force is found in between. The concept of vectors as arrows is emphasized, with the addition process involving placing them at the same point to form a parallelogram, where the diagonal represents the sum. Mathematical principles, including the use of coordinates and Pythagorean theorem, are applied to demonstrate the relationship between the vectors. Overall, the discussion highlights the intuitive and mathematical foundations of vector addition.
parshyaa
Messages
307
Reaction score
19
Geometric-addition-of-vectors-3.jpe

why addition of two vectors are represented by this diagram, why the sum of two vectors are between both the vectors.
  • Does it takes the idea of hitting a ball , if we hit a ball to its left side it goes right side and when hitted to its right side it goes left side and when we hit simultaneously it will go in between left and right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. You may imagine a vector being a force, that points in a certain direction. The strength of the force is represented by the length of the vector. E.g. a sailing ship is driven by the wind into one direction and the rudder adds a force by the resistance of water into eventually another direction, forcing the ship into a different direction than the wind blows.

Mathematically you could either use coordinates and see where addition of them leads you to, or think of a vector as simply being an arrow. If you want to add two of them, they have to be somehow related to each other. To solve this you apply them at the same point in space. This automatically spans a parallelogram. Now you simply define its diagonal as the sum of the two vectors. Some considerations about the sailing ship or the coordinate version of the vectors show, that it perfectly makes sense to do so.
 
  • Like
Likes parshyaa
Look at it like someone walking a path. All paths are judged equivalent because they all begin at Q and end at S. But it could be a path much more complicated and it would also be equivalent, like in the following image:
multSum.gif
 
Hitting the ball is an analogy. Moving the ball is another (somewhat easier and quieter) analogy
(after all, the word vector comes from vehere which means 'move' ):

If we move the ball from O by vector ##\vec A## it ends up in R
If we then move the ball from O by vector ##\vec B## it ends up in S

If we move the ball from O by vector ##\vec B## it ends up in A
If we then move the ball from O by vector ##\vec A## it ends up in S

(whichs shows that ##\vec A + \vec B = \vec B + \vec A##).​

We designate ##\alpha## as the angle between ##\vec A## and ##\vec B## and use a little Pythagoras. Then it's easy to see that $$
|\vec A + \vec B |^2 = \left ( |\vec A| + |\vec B |\cos\alpha\right) ^2 + \left ( |\vec B |\sin\alpha\right) ^2 = |\vec A|^2 + |\vec B |^2 + 2 |\vec A| |\vec B |\cos\alpha
$$
For more, check here
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
753
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K