The BEAST's 50 Most Loathsome Americans of 2007

  • News
  • Thread starter fourier jr
  • Start date
  • #1
740
13
the list has the charges against the person, the evidence against them, and their sentence. check out what they have to say about people like YOU (especially), Bill O'Reilly, John Hagee, Ann Coulter, the founding fathers, Duane Chapman or any of the current presidential candidates:
http://www.buffalobeast.com/122/50mostloathsome2007.html [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Contrapositive
The Bush/Cheney caricature creeps me out.
 
  • #3
falc39
LOL. number 9 is easily the best one.

funny and so true.
 
  • #4
BobG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
185
81
Wait a minute. You isn't more loathsome than Anne Coulter, Michael Vick, or Albert Gonzalez. In fact, Michael Chertoff isn't more loathsome than those three.

And Lou Dobbs surely has to rate as more loathsome than any TV host that still has a program. The guy has slowly descended into near insanity.
 
  • #5
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,236
215
And Lou Dobbs surely has to rate as more loathsome than any TV host that still has a program. The guy has slowly descended into near insanity.
Why do you say that? He is out to save the middle class, which indeed needs saving.

He goes over the edge at times but his aim is dead-on. And people who want to sell-out this country call him a racist amoung other things, but he's not. You can always tell when someone speaks the truth: He is accused of saying everything except what he actually said.

Dobbs has done more to help get illegal immigration under control than anyone. He is a great American fighting for working-class Americans, every day.

He was also one of two lightnings rods that created the storm of controversy that stopped Bush from turning control of our ports over to Dubai.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
230
0
Ha ha, fourier jr. where in the hell did you find "The BEAST". It's so far left-wing its nearly terrorist sanctioned!
 
  • #7
918
16
Why do you say that? He is out to save the middle class, which indeed needs saving.
I'm confused Ivan. I thought that you hated the American people. Why do you want to save them? Also, I thought you wanted to become an immigrant yourself. Do you really think you can make immigrants suffer here and they will accept you when you go there?

Lou Dobbs reports on the downside of immigrants taking jobs as producers, but ignores the upside of them providing jobs as consumers.
 
  • #8
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,051
18
And Lou Dobbs surely has to rate as more loathsome than any TV host that still has a program.
Did O'Reilly lose his show?
 
  • #9
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,236
215
I'm confused Ivan. I thought that you hated the American people.
Perhaps you can show me where I said that. I have said that the American people who have supported this illegal regime [Bush] have failed their own system and betrayed American ideals.

Why do you want to save them?
I am interested in saving what soldiers die for - the Constitution.

Also, I thought you wanted to become an immigrant yourself.
A legal immigrant, yes, and only because I now fear our government and what has been happening in this country - support of torture, an illegal war where the perpetrators go unpunished and remain in power, preemptive strikes, secret prisons, spying on US citizens without legal review, prisoners held without legal recourse, the trashing of the Geneva Conventions, and now even preemptive arrests, for example. These are literally examples of what defined the enemy not that long ago. I don't want to end up an old man living in a totalitarian state. If most Americans no longer value the Constitution, then America is dead.

Do you really think you can make immigrants suffer here and they will accept you when you go there?
I welcome legal immigrants with open arms.

Lou Dobbs reports on the downside of immigrants taking jobs as producers, but ignores the upside of them providing jobs as consumers.
Lou Dobbs has nothing against legal immigrants. He also supports an effective migrant worker policy. What is at stake is control of the border, which is the primary job of the federal government - yet another failure of the system because of people like Bush selling-out this country.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,929
2,246
Ha ha, fourier jr. where in the hell did you find "The BEAST". It's so far left-wing its nearly terrorist sanctioned!
I wouldn't say that it's necessarily left-wing, since it targets some who are considered left-wing, albeit very few. On the other hand, it's interesting that Michael Moore is not on the list.

Is there no one these guys dislike, or conversely is there anyone these guys like?

I wonder if they are into self-loathing.
 
  • #11
740
13
I wouldn't say that it's necessarily left-wing, since it targets some who are considered left-wing, albeit very few. On the other hand, it's interesting that Michael Moore is not on the list.
I was surprised that Barack Obama didn't make the list. He's said that he would attack Pakistan's nuclear facilities if a non-US-friendly regime ever took over. He'd even invade Pakistan without their permission if the Taliban ever spread there from Afghanistan. Ron Paul didn't make the list either, he's said the US should withdraw from the UN, the WTO, he'd abolish major federal departments like education & commerce, has said he'd let market forces sort out the situation in Darfur (ie at some point it would become uneconomical)....

edit: here's my exhibit A against Ron Paul
"Though I'm not sure just now what that details of Darfur's Market-solution should look like just now, I'm way too busy, I do think it's clear the janjaweed needs to be incentivized somehow to stop its genocide. But, if the invisible hand decrees that the Darfurians being slaughtered should be wiped out, it's probably for the best."

& Obama:
"If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."
 
Last edited:
  • #12
230
0
Astronuc, if you read any of the other articles on the site, you'll see that it does infact state that it is left-wing.
 
  • #13
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,051
18
On the other hand, it's interesting that Michael Moore is not on the list.
Also Sean Hannity!
 
  • #14
918
16
I have said that the American people who have supported this illegal regime [Bush] have failed their own system and betrayed American ideals.
You're right, you never used the word hate. My bad. But I should be excused. The hatred fairly drips.

That whole thing about legal vs illegal immigration is a distinction without a difference. If the only problem with illegal immigrants is that they are illegal, then make them legal. You know, like NORML says about marijuana. It is especially hypocritical to make this distinction when you plan to take advantage of it. If there is a problem with illegal immigrants other than their illegality, what is it? If Americans are betrayers and foreigners are undesirables, what's left? Where will you go?
 
  • #15
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,929
2,246
Astronuc, if you read any of the other articles on the site, you'll see that it does infact state that it is left-wing.
Ick! I'd rather not read the rest of the site, but please show me where the authors or the site indicates that they/it are left-wing.

It's mostly a vulgar rant, and it's not something I'll go back and read over and over. Once is more than enough.

So if these guys are going after H. Clinton, Pelosi and Reid, then does that infer that they are right of left?


Isn't there someone in the middle willing to step up are represent the people of the US rather than one of two political parties? Don't we deserve better than this? Someone? Anyone?

I've got $12 in my pocket, and some change. It's yours if you register as a candidate for President in 2008. :biggrin:
 
  • #16
230
0
Example one:
http://www.buffalobeast.com/122/*******.htm [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
russ_watters
Mentor
19,948
6,439
So if these guys are going after H. Clinton, Pelosi and Reid, then does that infer that they are right of left?
It infers that they are so far to the left that Clinton is to their right. Essentially, their biggest complaint about those two is that they don't have the guts to be further to the left.
 
  • #18
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,929
2,246
The *******.htm in binzing's link doesn't help.

I'll take your word for it. It's not a site that I would care to go back to. :rolleyes:
 
  • #19
230
0
Yeah, its kind of (actually really) abrasive.
 
  • #20
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,929
2,246
Yeah, its kind of (actually really) abrasive.
Slimey and abrasive. :yuck:
 
  • #21
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,236
215
You're right, you never used the word hate. My bad. But I should be excused. The hatred fairly drips.
Actually if you are going to put words into my mouth then there is no excuse. What I hate is the Bush/Cheney/Rove agenda and the rape of the Constitution. Any loyal American has no choice; according to the Constutition. Do I like people who are supporting the destruction of this country? Of course not. Don't expect me to be willing to die for the Constitution when I'm twenty but not worry about it now.

When we get the border under control, then we can talk about legalization and how many immigrants are allowed to enter each year. But first we control the borders and stop the uncontrolled invasion. In the mean time, the Republicans should quit lying about how this is not taking jobs away from legal citizens.
 
Last edited:
  • #22
740
13
Yeah, its kind of (actually really) abrasive.
Slimey and abrasive. :yuck:
It's no slimier than people like Ann Coulter or Bill O'Reilly, not as far as I'm concerned. & they don't even propagate lies.
 
  • #23
mheslep
Gold Member
311
728
the list has the charges against the person, the evidence against them, and their sentence. check out what they have to say about people like YOU (especially), Bill O'Reilly, John Hagee, Ann Coulter, the founding fathers, Duane Chapman or any of the current presidential candidates:
http://www.buffalobeast.com/122/50mostloathsome2007.html [Broken]
It's no slimier than people like Ann Coulter or Bill O'Reilly, not as far as I'm concerned. & they don't even propagate lies.
Oh yes, yes. You forgot #28: "The Troops" "Charges: Rubes, the lot of 'em. Sentence: Walter Reed."
There's plenty of 'loathsome' sites out their but I'd say this would be top 3.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #24
BobG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
185
81
Did O'Reilly lose his show?
Also Sean Hannity!
Ah, I did forget Hannity. He'd have to rate #1 on the list of loathsome news talk hosts:

1. Hannity
2. Dobbs
3.(tie) O no! (O'Reilly and Olberman)


I've never watched Glenn Beck or that woman that drove someone to suicide, so I can't put them in my list.
 
  • #25
918
16
Actually if you are going to put words into my mouth then there is no excuse.
Very judicious use of the word if, seeing as I never did that.
 

Related Threads on The BEAST's 50 Most Loathsome Americans of 2007

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
78
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
47
Views
9K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
25
Views
4K
Top