The Benefits of the Cancelled SSC in Texas

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CookieSalesman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The cancellation of the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) in Texas, which was intended to achieve proton collisions at 20 TeV, significantly impacted high-energy physics research. The SSC would have enhanced the discovery potential for particles such as the Higgs boson by increasing the probability of finding energetic partons during collisions. Although the SSC's design luminosity was only 10% of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), its higher energy capabilities would have allowed for the exploration of heavier particles, potentially beyond the reach of current experiments. However, the older detector technology planned for the SSC would have limited measurement precision compared to modern advancements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of high-energy particle physics
  • Familiarity with proton-proton collision dynamics
  • Knowledge of parton distribution functions
  • Awareness of collider design and luminosity concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of collider luminosity on particle discovery
  • Study the role of parton distribution functions in high-energy collisions
  • Explore the advancements in detector technology since the SSC's design
  • Investigate the current status of string theory testing in collider experiments
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in high-energy physics, and students interested in collider experiments and their implications for particle discovery.

CookieSalesman
Messages
103
Reaction score
5
The SSC that was planned to be built in Texas was cancelled, and was supposed to produce protons of about 20 TeV?

Can anyone tell me exactly why it would have been much better?
For instance, discovering the higgs-englert would have been easier, and sooner, had we used the SSC- but what other experiements require such energies? What's the benefit of the SSC? Apparently we can't test string theory with the SSC...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It terms of centre of mass energies:
The hard interaction for producing new particles can be well described by the interaction of partons (quarks /antiquarks and gluons) within the hadron and the associated probability of finding these partons with a given energy with the hadron.

If the colliding hadrons have more energy, this means kinematically the partons can have higher energy, but perhaps more importantly is the probability of finding a Parton in both hadrons with enough energy to produce a particle X (the Higgs for example) can increase dramatically.

A good example is the gluon-gluon luminosity for producing a 125 GeV object. Here is and old plot with some luminosities
http://lutece.fnal.gov/PartonLum/WebFigs/gglum.pdf

On the other hand, the detectors which were designed back then would not have been as good (older technology). So less precision in the measurements (with more statistics).

On string theory, current collider experiments are not directly testing string theory. If string theories are designed in a way to have phenomenological consequences (such as heavy Gauge bosons), then these things may be tested at current collider searches (http://inspirehep.net/record/265862/citations, I just googled this last one as an example)
 
The SSC was planned with a lower collision rate (only 10% of the LHC design luminosity) - for low-energetic particles the LHC is better. At the Higgs mass, the higher luminosity would probably win, and the SSC would have needed a bit longer to find it (but it would have started earlier...).

In addition to the higher parton probabilities RGevo mentioned, a higher energy simply allows to look for heavier particles. We don't know if there are particles with 15 TeV, for example, but the SSC would have had some chance to proce them, while it is completely impossible to directly produce them at the LHC. Indirect searches still allow to look for them, however.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K