The Berry Connection and Gauge Invariance in Quantum Systems

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the Berry connection and its gauge invariance in quantum systems, exploring the implications of gauge transformations on the Berry phase. Participants delve into theoretical aspects, physical interpretations, and the relationship between gauge freedom and observable quantities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines the Berry connection and its field strength, suggesting an analogy to Maxwell's theory and questioning the physical meaning of gauge redundancy.
  • Another participant explains that the Berry phase remains invariant under gauge transformations, specifically when a phase factor is added to the instantaneous eigenstates.
  • A different participant challenges the notion of a 'physical source' for the gauge transformation in the context of a particle in a box, seeking clarification on its origin.
  • One response asserts that the gauge freedom is akin to electrodynamics, indicating that different gauge choices do not affect observable physical quantities.
  • Another participant emphasizes that gauge invariance indicates degrees of freedom without physical relevance, highlighting the nature of gauge transformations in relation to physical states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the physical implications of gauge invariance and the nature of gauge transformations. There is no consensus on the physical source of the gauge transformation, with some arguing it is a conceptual freedom while others seek a more concrete explanation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of gauge transformations and their implications for observables, but these assumptions remain unresolved. The relationship between gauge freedom and physical observables is also a point of contention.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
The Berry connection ##\mathcal{A}_{k}(\lambda)## of a quantum system is given by

$$\mathcal{A}_{k}(\lambda) \equiv -i \langle n|\frac{\partial}{\partial \lambda^{k}}|n\rangle,$$

where the ket ##|n(\lambda)\rangle## depends on the parameters ##\lambda^{k}, k=1,2,\dots## in the system.

The field strength ##\mathcal{F}_{kl}## of the Berry connection ##\mathcal{A}_{k}(\lambda)## is defined by

$$\mathcal{F}_{kl} = \frac{\partial\mathcal{k}}{\partial\lambda_{l}}-\frac{\partial\mathcal{l}}{\partial\lambda_{k}}.$$

Therefore, we can define an analog of Maxwell's theory with the Berry connection ##\mathcal{A}_{k}(\lambda)##. As such, we expect the Berry connection ##\mathcal{A}_{k}(\lambda)## to be gauge invariant. In other words, there must be a gauge redundancy in the definition of the Berry connection ##\mathcal{A}_{k}(\lambda)##I was wondering if you guys have any idea about the physical meaning of this gauge redundancy for some state ##|n(\lambda)\rangle##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This basically means that the Berry phase remains invariant under the gauge transformation ##|n(\lambda)\rangle \rightarrow e^{i\phi(\lambda)}|n(\lambda)\rangle## (i.e. addition of a phase factor to the instantaneous eigenstates). This transformation modifies the Berry connection ##\mathcal{A}(\lambda) \rightarrow \mathcal{A}(\lambda) + \nabla \phi##. However, if ##\phi(\lambda)## is single-valued, then the Berry phase does not change.
 
Ok, but say you take a particle in a box and rotate the box in parameter space in a closed loop, like you usually do in Berry phase analysis.

What is the physical source of the gauge transformation of the Berry connection in this case?
 
As I understand it, there is no 'physical source' - simply put, it just means that
1. There is a certain gauge freedom (similar to electrodynamics, in which different gauge choices do not affect the physical quantities observed), and this is nothing more than saying that ##|\psi\rangle## and ##e^{i \theta} |\psi\rangle ## correspond to the same physical state.
2. The Berry phase fits the characteristics of being a true observable - it is not an artifact arising from our gauge choice.
 
failexam said:
the physical meaning of this gauge redundancy
Gauge invariance means precisely that there are degrees of freedom without any physical relevance, and corresponding gauge transformations that tell how the variables can be changed without changing the physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K