Bose-Einstein statistics for μ>ε

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
LightPhoton
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Flaws in Bose-Einstein statistics for μ>ε
The Gibbs sum is given by

$$Z=\sum[\lambda \exp(-\varepsilon/\tau)]^N$$

where ##\lambda\equiv\exp(\mu/\tau)##. Since we are assuming ##\mu>\varepsilon##, we take only the last term of the sum because all others can be neglected.

thus

$$Z\approx[\lambda \exp(-\varepsilon/\tau)]^N$$

Now

$$\langle N\rangle =\lambda\frac{\partial}{\partial\lambda}\ln Z=\lambda\frac{\partial}{\partial\lambda}(N\ln\lambda-N\varepsilon/\tau)=N$$


But in general, we see that for any parameter ##X##

$$\langle X\rangle=\sum X_N[\lambda \exp(-\varepsilon/\tau)]^N/Z\approx X_N$$

where ##X_N## is the value at ##N\rightarrow\infty##, thus making the whole model useless.

But is this the only flaw in taking ##\mu>\varepsilon##?

That is, for the usual Bose-Einstein distribution

$$f(\varepsilon)=\frac1{\exp[(\varepsilon-\mu)/\tau]-1}$$

we get ##f(\varepsilon)<0## for ##\mu>\varepsilon##, which is physically wrong.

Are any such "physical" conditions present for the above model?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For bosons the energy ##\epsilon_0## of the lowest energy state sets an upper limit for the chemical potential. In case when the chemical potential ##\mu## approaches the lowest energy level ##\epsilon_0## from below (##\mu\rightarrow\epsilon_0##), the occupation of the lowest energy level diverges; this phenomenon is called the Bose-Einstein condensation.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier and pines-demon