The Big Bang Theory a Fairy Tale? So says presidential candidate Ben Carson....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of Ben Carson's views on the Big Bang Theory and science funding, particularly in the context of his potential presidency. Participants explore concerns about the influence of personal beliefs on scientific funding and the broader societal impact of anti-science sentiments.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern about Carson's characterization of the Big Bang Theory as a "fairy tale" and its potential impact on government funding for scientific research.
  • Others reference historical precedents, such as William Proxmire's actions against NASA programs, to suggest that political climates can significantly affect scientific funding.
  • There are discussions about the disconnect between scientific understanding and personal beliefs, particularly among those in the medical field, with some noting that not all medical professionals have a strong grasp of scientific principles.
  • Some participants highlight the tension between personal beliefs and professional capabilities, questioning whether Carson's views should influence his role in government.
  • Concerns are raised about the growing ranks of fundamentalists and their potential influence on science policy and funding decisions.
  • Several participants express disbelief at Carson's anti-science views, particularly given his background as a neurosurgeon.
  • There are references to the broader implications of undermining faith in science within society, with some questioning the trust within the STEM community.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express disagreement regarding the implications of Carson's views on science and funding. There is no consensus on the potential outcomes or the extent of influence his beliefs may have on scientific research and education.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the historical context of political influences on science funding and the varying levels of scientific understanding among professionals in related fields. The discussion reflects a range of opinions on the relationship between personal beliefs and scientific credibility.

  • #151
phinds said:
Does it matter? Since he believes in a literal 6 24-hour day creation, why worry about what other nonsense he believes?
Maybe he believes the days were longer due to time dilation. :-)
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #152
Chrono G. Xay said:
And here I thought that this thread was actually going to do something constructive, such as examine the ideas presented in this article (below), and *not* engage in a bunch of time-wasting commentary on people :

http://m.phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html

Anyone for a game of The Sims?

Actually this thread is in the current affairs section so the discussion here is about politicians and their anti-science rants. Anyway do you really think Ben Carson studied physics and then expressed his anti-big bang sentiments ?
 
  • #153
This thread has veered away from the initial topic and has run its course. Closed.