The commutations relations for left/right handed fermions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter decerto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermions Relations
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the commutation relations for left-handed fermions, specifically using the projection operator \( P_L = \frac{1}{2}(1 - \gamma^5) \). The user successfully establishes the relationship \( \left\{\psi_L^a, \psi_L^{\dagger b}\right\} = P_L^{ab} \delta(x-y) \), confirming that the projection operator simplifies the commutation relations. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of explicitly writing out spinor indices to avoid confusion and ensure clarity in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fermionic fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with projection operators, specifically \( P_L \) and \( P_R \)
  • Knowledge of gamma matrices and their role in quantum field theory
  • Basic grasp of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of projection operators in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the implications of the Dirac equation on fermionic fields
  • Explore the role of spinor indices in quantum field calculations
  • Investigate the significance of the trace of gamma matrices in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, as well as graduate students studying particle physics and fermionic behavior in quantum systems.

decerto
Messages
84
Reaction score
2
I have a problem where I have to know the commutation relations for left handed fermions. I know
##\psi_L=\frac{1}{2}(1-\gamma^5)\psi##

##\psi^\dagger_L=\psi^\dagger_L\frac{1}{2}(1-\gamma^5)##

and

## \left\{ \psi(x) , \psi^\dagger(y)\right\} = \delta(x-y)##

So writing

## \left\{P_L\psi(x) , \psi^\dagger(y)P_L\right\} ##

##=P_L\psi(x) \psi^\dagger(y)P_L + \psi^\dagger(y)P_LP_L\psi(x)##

And I don't see how I can go any further.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it looks fine up to here...
 
ChrisVer said:
it looks fine up to here...

I need to write the left handed commutator in terms of the unprojected commutator I don't see a nice way to do this? How can I commute the P_L operators past the psi's?
 
I want to say its the same, and will just be ##P_L \delta(x-y)##, but I'm not sure.

Maybe what you can do is write out the spinor indices explicitly. Normally you have :
$$
\left\{\psi^a , \psi^{\dagger b} \right\} = \psi^a \psi^{\dagger b}+\psi^{\dagger b} \psi^a = \delta(x-y) \delta^{ab}
$$
now we want to understand
$$
\left\{\psi_L^a , \psi_L^{\dagger b} \right\} = P_L^{ai} \psi^i \psi^{\dagger j}P_L^{jb} + \psi^{\dagger j} P_L^{jb}P_L^{ai} \psi^i
$$

we can combine and use the full commutator:

$$
\left\{\psi_L^a , \psi_L^{\dagger b} \right\} = P_L^{ai}P_L^{jb} (\psi^i \psi^{\dagger j} + \psi^{\dagger j} \psi^i)\\
\left\{\psi_L^a , \psi_L^{\dagger b} \right\} = P_L^{ai}P_L^{jb} \delta(x-y) \delta^{ij}
$$
you can change the indices with the delta function and use ##P_L^{ai}P_L^{ib} = P_L^{ab}## to combine the projections and get
$$
\left\{\psi_L^a , \psi_L^{\dagger b} \right\} = P_L^{ab} \delta(x-y)
$$
If ##a=b## then you get(in D then 4 dimensions)
$$P_L^{aa} = \frac{D}{2} = 2$$
This is because by definition the trace of gamma_5 is zero, and the trace of the identity matrix is D(4).

I think this is right...
 
Thanks, that makes sense, the whole dropping spinor indexes for simplicity makes things less clear sometimes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K