The Cooper Problem in tight binding

mcas
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Find the coupling energy of a Cooper pair in a 1D lattice in tight binding (nearest neighbors), i.e. solve the Cooper Problem.
Relevant Equations
An equation to solve:
[itex]1=\lambda \sum_{\vec{k}} |w_{\vec{k}}|^2 \frac{1}{E-2\xi_{\vec{k}}}[/itex] for [itex]{\xi_\vec{k} \geq 0}[/itex]
where:
[itex]\lambda = const[/itex] is a part of a seperable potential [itex]V_{\vec{k}\vec{k'}}[/itex]
[itex]\xi_{\vec{k}} = \varepsilon_{\vec{k}}-\mu[/itex]
[itex]w_{\vec{k}}[/itex] is [itex]1[/itex] for [itex]\hbar w_D \geq \xi_{\vec{k}} \geq 0[/itex] and [itex]0[/itex] in any other case
We have a one dimensional lattice with a lattice constant equal to a (I'm omitting vector notation because we are in 1D). The reciprocal lattice vector is k_n=n\frac{2 \pi}{a}.
So to get the nearest neighbour approximation I need to sum over k = -\frac{2 \pi}{a}, 0, \frac{2 \pi}{a}.
If I understand everything correctly this would be the equation I need to solve for E:
1=\lambda ( |w_{\frac{2 \pi}{a}}|^2 \frac{1}{E-2\xi_{\frac{2 \pi}{a}}} + |w_{0}|^2 \frac{1}{E-2\xi_{0}} + |w_{-\frac{2 \pi}{a}}|^2 \frac{1}{E-2\xi_{-\frac{2 \pi}{a}}})

I'm not sure if this is the right approach. If so, would the values of |w_{i}| equal 1 in this equation? Do we know the values of \xi_{i}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is the correct approach. The values of |w_{i}| should equal 1, and the values of \xi_{i} should be given in the problem statement or can be calculated from the corresponding energies.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top