The effect of mass on roller coaster cars

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of mass on the time it takes for a roller coaster car to complete a track. The original poster is conducting an experiment using a hotwheels track, comparing a lighter car to a heavier one with added weight, and has observed unexpected results regarding their completion times.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between mass, potential energy, and velocity, questioning why the heavier car performed slower than anticipated. Some suggest that increased mass leads to greater friction due to increased normal force, while others consider the role of inertia and initial velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants offering insights into the physics involved. Some have provided theoretical explanations, while others express confusion about the implications of their findings. There is no explicit consensus, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of their experimental results versus theoretical expectations, particularly regarding the role of friction and inertia. The original poster has indicated a need for further reflection on the problem.

agbuyer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For my science fair project, I am testing the effect of changes in mass on the time it takes a car to complete a roller coaster track. The track is made of hotwheels track and has an initial ramp, two turns and a loop. I used the same car both times (once without added weight and once with an additional 10 grams). After testing for many trials, I found that the lighter car finished the track faster than the heavier car.
This is the opposite of what I thought would happen. I thought that because the heavier car had greater potential energy, it would go faster. As I research this question, I start the think that the two cars should have finished at the same time regardless of mass.
What is going on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the formula for what happens in energy changes. Theoretically, mass should not make any difference.

mgh = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + friction

mgh = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + umg cos(\theta)d

factor out the mass

gh = \frac{1}{2}v^2 + ug cos(\theta)d

Everything left is a constant. Gravity doesn't change, the height of the car doesn't change, u (actually mew) doesn't change, the angle doesn't change. Velocity should not change either.


My original post had an explanation for why lighter was better but it was wrong. I'll half to think about this for a while.
 
Last edited:
With the increase in mass you also increase the normal force the track exerts on the car and thus increase the force of friction between the track and the car which is why the heavier car takes longer
 
With the increase in mass you also increase the normal force the track exerts on the car and thus increase the force of friction between the track and the car which is why the heavier car takes longer

Although that is the logical explanation, the math disproves it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help. Please keep thinking about this problem.

The formula doesn't take time into account. The heavier car starts more slowly because it has a greater mass, more inertia. So over the beginning part of the track, the heavier car is slower. Maybe over time it evens out but with the length of my track it doesn't?
 
Alright... a = f / m f = m * g
a = (m*g)/m = g. Add a cosinus or sinus and you'll have the exact amount. This all is thesame for each car though, it doesn't depend of it's weight. It has to be either friction or aerodynamics. And I am not into either of those. Strange problem!
 

Kinetic Energy = 1/2mv^2...therefore, as the mass is increased, the velocity is decreased. Hence the cart would take longer to to complete the roller coaster track because it travels at a lower velocity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
936
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K