The electromagnetic force of quarks

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inadequacy of electromagnetism to explain the binding of quarks, specifically up quarks with a charge of +2/3 and down quarks with a charge of -1/3. It is established that electromagnetism alone cannot account for the stability of protons or the existence of particles like the Δ++ and Δ−, which consist of multiple quarks. The size of the bound states predicted by electromagnetism would be approximately 100,000 times larger than observed atomic nuclei, indicating the necessity of a stronger force, namely the strong nuclear force, to account for these phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quark charge properties
  • Familiarity with the strong nuclear force
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics and meson production
  • Concept of binding energy in atomic and subatomic particles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the strong nuclear force and its role in particle binding
  • Study the Standard Model of particle physics for quark interactions
  • Examine the implications of color charge in quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Explore experimental evidence for the existence of baryons and mesons
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental forces governing quark interactions and the structure of matter.

MacGyver Megh
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Why there is strong force while quarks has charge themselves?
If an up quark has 2/3 of positive charge and down quark has 1/3 of negative charge then why don't they add together by their electromagnetic force?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ormaaj
Physics news on Phys.org
There are several observational facts that mean that electromagnetism is not enough.

To start with, electromagnetism is not strong enough to bind two quarks of opposite charge as tightly as a nucleus or a meson. Instead, you would get something of a size similar to an atom, which is about five orders of magnitude larger.

Second, electromagnetism could not produce a proton, which has a net positive charge. Instead of being an energetically favoured state, the proton would not constitute a bound state and we would not exist.

Third, electromagnetism cannot explain several other effects that has to do with quarks, such as the color factor appearing in meson production and similar things.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ormaaj, ohwilleke, MacGyver Megh and 1 other person
To add some more problems:
It would allow 1 up and 1 down to combine to a stable particle - but we don't see that in nature.
It would allow individual quarks to be free - but we don't see that in nature.
It would not allow the existence of ##\Delta^{++}## made out of three up quarks or ##\Delta^-## made out of three down quarks - but we found these particles.
It would not allow the existence of larger nuclei - but we see them in nature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and ohwilleke
Could you please tell me why electromagnetism is not enough? And what sort of observations they had been faced?
 
MacGyver Megh said:
Could you please tell me why electromagnetism is not enough?
I already told you that:
Orodruin said:
Instead, you would get something of a size similar to an atom, which is about five orders of magnitude larger.
 
Orodruin said:
I already told you that:
Can you please give an example or the equations what is five time larger magnitudes?
 
MacGyver Megh said:
Can you please give an example or the equations what is five time larger magnitudes?
It means that the radius of the nucleus would be around ##10^5 = 100000## times larger than what is observed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K