The Emergence of Beyond the Standard Model: What We've Learned

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the topic of "beyond the standard model" in particle physics, exploring its historical emergence as an acceptable area of inquiry and its contributions to scientific knowledge. Participants reference various milestones and developments in the field, including neutrino mass and strong interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions when "beyond the standard model" became an acceptable topic and what it has contributed to knowledge.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the reliability of scientific predictions, referring to "soothsayers of science."
  • A claim is made that the standard model assumed its present form in 1967, referencing Wikipedia as a source.
  • A subsequent reply challenges the initial claim by pointing out additional developments in 1973-74 related to strong interactions.
  • The same participant notes that neutrino mass is well established and suggests it requires modifications to the standard model, though they hedge this with "some might say slight."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the timeline or implications of developments beyond the standard model, with multiple competing views and interpretations present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific historical milestones and the interpretation of their significance, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these developments on the standard model.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
When did beyond the standard model become an acceptable topic, and what has it added to our knowledge?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I see the soothsayers of science are as shy as ever.
 
According to Wiki, it assumed its present form in 1967.
 
DaveC426913 said:
According to Wiki, it assumed its present form in 1967.
Really ? No you did not read down to "strong interaction in 1973-74" :smile:

edit
If you really scroll down, you can find "neutrino mass" which is really well established and does require some (some might say slight) modification of the particle physics standard model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K