MHB The endomorphism ring is a field

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Ring
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit and $M$ be a $R$-module.

I want to show that the endomorphism ring $\text{End}_R(M)=\text{Hom}_R(M,M)$ of a simple $R$-module is a field. We have that $\text{End}_R(M)=\text{Hom}_R(M,M)=\{f:M\rightarrow M \mid f \ : \ R-\text{ homomorphism}\}$.

We have that since $M$ s simple, it is cyclic and isomorphic to $R/J$, where $J$ is a maximal ideal of $R$.

So, to show that the endomorphism ring is a field do we have to show that the mapping $R\rightarrow \text{End}_R(R/J)$ is an homomorphism with kernel $J$ ? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mathmari,

In http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/show-966-isomorphism-18576.html, you proved that if $R$ is a commutative ring with unity, then every nonzero homomorphism of simple $R$-modules is an isomorphism. Using that theorem, you can claim that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$, and therefore invertible. Consequently, $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is a field.
 
Euge said:
In http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/show-966-isomorphism-18576.html, you proved that if $R$ is a commutative ring with unity, then every nonzero homomorphism of simple $R$-modules is an isomorphism. Using that theorem, you can claim that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$, and therefore invertible. Consequently, $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is a field.

How do we know that there are non-zero homomorphisms? (Wondering)

Also, how do we know that there are invertible elements, when we know that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
How do we know that there are non-zero homomorphisms? (Wondering)
There may not be, in which case $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is the zero ring, which is a field.

mathmari said:
Also, how do we know that there are invertible elements, when we know that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$ ? (Wondering)

Automorphisms of $M$ are bijections, and bijections have inverses.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top