MHB The endomorphism ring is a field

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Ring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The endomorphism ring $\text{End}_R(M)$ of a simple $R$-module is definitively a field. This conclusion is based on the theorem that states every nonzero homomorphism of simple $R$-modules is an isomorphism, which implies that every nonzero element of $\text{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$ and thus invertible. The discussion also addresses the existence of non-zero homomorphisms and the nature of invertible elements, confirming that automorphisms, being bijections, possess inverses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutative rings with unity
  • Knowledge of $R$-modules and their properties
  • Familiarity with homomorphisms and isomorphisms in algebra
  • Concept of automorphisms and their invertibility
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of simple $R$-modules in detail
  • Learn about the structure of endomorphism rings in algebra
  • Explore the implications of the theorem regarding homomorphisms of simple modules
  • Investigate examples of commutative rings and their maximal ideals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying module theory and ring theory, particularly those interested in the properties of endomorphism rings and simple modules.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit and $M$ be a $R$-module.

I want to show that the endomorphism ring $\text{End}_R(M)=\text{Hom}_R(M,M)$ of a simple $R$-module is a field. We have that $\text{End}_R(M)=\text{Hom}_R(M,M)=\{f:M\rightarrow M \mid f \ : \ R-\text{ homomorphism}\}$.

We have that since $M$ s simple, it is cyclic and isomorphic to $R/J$, where $J$ is a maximal ideal of $R$.

So, to show that the endomorphism ring is a field do we have to show that the mapping $R\rightarrow \text{End}_R(R/J)$ is an homomorphism with kernel $J$ ? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mathmari,

In http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/show-966-isomorphism-18576.html, you proved that if $R$ is a commutative ring with unity, then every nonzero homomorphism of simple $R$-modules is an isomorphism. Using that theorem, you can claim that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$, and therefore invertible. Consequently, $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is a field.
 
Euge said:
In http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/show-966-isomorphism-18576.html, you proved that if $R$ is a commutative ring with unity, then every nonzero homomorphism of simple $R$-modules is an isomorphism. Using that theorem, you can claim that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$, and therefore invertible. Consequently, $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is a field.

How do we know that there are non-zero homomorphisms? (Wondering)

Also, how do we know that there are invertible elements, when we know that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
How do we know that there are non-zero homomorphisms? (Wondering)
There may not be, in which case $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is the zero ring, which is a field.

mathmari said:
Also, how do we know that there are invertible elements, when we know that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$ ? (Wondering)

Automorphisms of $M$ are bijections, and bijections have inverses.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
976
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
920
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K