The endomorphism ring is a field

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Ring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the endomorphism ring of a simple module over a commutative ring with unity, specifically whether the endomorphism ring is a field. Participants explore the implications of the simplicity of the module and the existence of homomorphisms and automorphisms.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that to show the endomorphism ring is a field, it may be necessary to demonstrate that the mapping from the ring to the endomorphism ring is a homomorphism with a specific kernel.
  • Another participant references a previous theorem stating that every nonzero homomorphism of simple modules is an isomorphism, which implies that nonzero elements of the endomorphism ring are automorphisms and thus invertible.
  • A participant questions the existence of non-zero homomorphisms, suggesting that if none exist, the endomorphism ring could be the zero ring, which is also a field.
  • There is a further inquiry into the nature of invertible elements in the endomorphism ring, particularly in relation to the automorphisms being bijections that have inverses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the existence of non-zero homomorphisms and the implications for the endomorphism ring being a field. There is no consensus on these points, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependency on the existence of non-zero homomorphisms and the implications for the structure of the endomorphism ring, which are not fully established in the discussion.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit and $M$ be a $R$-module.

I want to show that the endomorphism ring $\text{End}_R(M)=\text{Hom}_R(M,M)$ of a simple $R$-module is a field. We have that $\text{End}_R(M)=\text{Hom}_R(M,M)=\{f:M\rightarrow M \mid f \ : \ R-\text{ homomorphism}\}$.

We have that since $M$ s simple, it is cyclic and isomorphic to $R/J$, where $J$ is a maximal ideal of $R$.

So, to show that the endomorphism ring is a field do we have to show that the mapping $R\rightarrow \text{End}_R(R/J)$ is an homomorphism with kernel $J$ ? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mathmari,

In http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/show-966-isomorphism-18576.html, you proved that if $R$ is a commutative ring with unity, then every nonzero homomorphism of simple $R$-modules is an isomorphism. Using that theorem, you can claim that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$, and therefore invertible. Consequently, $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is a field.
 
Euge said:
In http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/show-966-isomorphism-18576.html, you proved that if $R$ is a commutative ring with unity, then every nonzero homomorphism of simple $R$-modules is an isomorphism. Using that theorem, you can claim that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$, and therefore invertible. Consequently, $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is a field.

How do we know that there are non-zero homomorphisms? (Wondering)

Also, how do we know that there are invertible elements, when we know that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
How do we know that there are non-zero homomorphisms? (Wondering)
There may not be, in which case $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is the zero ring, which is a field.

mathmari said:
Also, how do we know that there are invertible elements, when we know that every nonzero element of $\operatorname{End}_R(M)$ is an automorphism of $M$ ? (Wondering)

Automorphisms of $M$ are bijections, and bijections have inverses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K