The energy needed to keep charges in place

  • Thread starter Thread starter Myr73
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Energy
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the energy required to place four positive charges at the vertices of a square. The charges are each +5.0 mC, and the square has a side length of 2.5 cm. Participants explore the concept of work done in assembling the charges and the energy associated with charged particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the work-energy relation and the energy needed to assemble multiple charges. Questions arise about the calculations for the work done in bringing each charge into position and the distances involved. Some participants suggest using diagrams to clarify the relationships between the charges.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the calculations and the conceptual understanding of the problem. There is a recognition of the need to consider different distances when calculating the work for charges placed diagonally versus those placed along the sides of the square. Some guidance has been offered regarding the approach to the problem, but no consensus has been reached on the final calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the unusual choice of units (cm and mC) in the problem statement, which may affect the calculations. There are also discussions about the implications of using different units and the need for careful conversion.

Myr73
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
How much energy is needed to place four positive charges, each of magnitude + 5.0mC, at the vertices of a square of side 2.5cm ?

I am not entirely sure where to start here. Am I looking for W=? like the work it takes to place it ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: work-energy relation.

Note: you don't need energy to keep charges in place, just to assemble them in the first place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Have you learned the energy associated with a pair of charged particles? If you haven't than first you should make sure you understand how to calculate the energy associated with a pair of particles before trying to solve a problem with multiple particles.
 
I am doing the work that was assigned to me, after the unit was done!
 
I am understanding to use the W=q( Vb-Va) = q( kQ/rb - kQ/ra) , and i am thinking you have to calculate like putting one at a time. Am I on the right track?
 
That is correct.
The work needed to put the first one there is zero.
The second charge has to do work, or have work done on it, associated with the potential from the first charge.
The third charge has to deal with both the other charges etc.
 
Thanks, sounds great :)
 
Q1=Q2=Q3=Q4= + 5.0 mC=0.005C k=9X10^9 r=2.5cm=0.025m
There is no repelling force on the first charge, therefore placing Q1 is zero energy
W1=0
The second charge would have the first charge is a repelling force on it.
W2=kq1q2/r= 9000000J
The third charge would have a repelling force of both charge 1 and charge 2.
W3= { kq1q3/r} + (kq2q3/r}= 9000000J+9000000J= 18000000J
The last charge will have all other three charges causing repelling forces on it.
W4={kq1q4/r} + {kq2q4/r} + {kq3q4/r} =27000000J

Total W= W1+W2+W3+W4= 0+ 9000000J+ 18000000J+ 27000000J=54000000J

This look right??
 
All charges magnitude q, and we want to assemble them into a square with side length a.

Bring the 1st charge to the origin - no work.
Bring the next charge to point (a,0) work = kq^2/a - you got that too, good.

Bring the third charge to point (0,a) ... this charge is distance "a" from (0,0) but is a different distance from (a,0). Your calculation gave them all the same distance.

Bring the fourth charge to point (a,a) to complete the square.
Two of the three distances are the same but one is different.

It helps to draw a picture.
 
  • #10
Right-Thanks- I missed that- Different r when its accros-
 
  • #11
Well done.
You'll find that a lot of physics is done with diagrams.
 
  • #12
So, correct me if I'm wrong please, I got
Adj^2 + Opp^2= Hyp^2 --> r(b)=SqRt{ 0.025m^2+ 0.025^2}
r (b)= 0.035m( across the square , from one corner to another)
The third charge would have a repelling force of both charge 1 and charge 2.
W3= { kq1q3/r(a)} + (kq2q3/r(b)}= 9000000J+6428571J= 15 428 571 J
The last charge will have all other three charges causing repelling forces on it.
W4={kq1q4/r(a)} + {kq2q4/r(a)} + {kq3q4/r(b)} = 24 428 571 J

Total W= W1+W2+W3+W4= 0+ 9000000J+ 15428 571J+ 24 428 571J=48 847 142J
 
  • #13
That looks good. It helps to do the whole thing in variables first though.
For 4 charges q in a square sides x

All charges same sign so all forces are repelling - need to do positive work to bring the charges to the square.
All charges same magnitude, so the sum will look like:U=kq^2(some factors)
The factors will depend on distances.

repulsion along a side adds a factor of 1/x^2
repulsion along a diagonal adds a factor of 1/2x^2 (pythagoras)
... thus two diagonals contributes the same as one side.

The first charge has no contribution
the next one adds a side (repulsion is only along one side of the square)
the next adds a side and a diagonal
the next adds two sides and a diagonal
that's a total of 4 sides and 2 diagonals or 5 sides all together.

U=5kq^2/x^2

x=2.5cm
q=5mC

Interesting that the question is given in cm and mC ... why pick those units?
k=8.988x109Nm^2/C^2 (10000 cm^2/m^2) (0.0001C^2/mC) = 8.988x109N (cm^2)/(mC^2)
... in other words - you don't have to convert to whole Coulombs and meters.
 
  • #14
Simon Bridge said:
Interesting that the question is given in cm and mC ... why pick those units?
k=8.988x109Nm^2/C^2 (10000 cm^2/m^2) (0.0001C^2/mC) = 8.988x109N (cm^2)/(mC^2)

1 mC= 0.001 C.

ehild
 
  • #15
1 mC= 0.001 C.
... so there is...
... and so there are 0.001C/mC or 10^-6 C^2/mC^2 oh I missed a zero?

k=8.988x10^8 N cm^2/mC^2.

I think I need a vacation :(
 
  • #16
Simon Bridge said:
... so there is...
... and so there are 0.001C/mC or 10^-6 C^2/mC^2 oh I missed a zero?
Two zeroes :devil:
Simon Bridge said:
k=8.988x10^[STRIKE]8[/STRIKE]7 N cm^2/mC^2.

I think I need a vacation :(

Happy vacation!

ehild
 
  • #17
Thank you for all your help :D
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
973
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K