A The expectation of the sampling distribution of Pearson's correlation

Click For Summary
The expectation of the sampling distribution of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient is not always equal to the population correlation coefficient, particularly when sample sizes are small. The shape of this distribution is influenced by the sample size and the joint distribution of the variables involved. For very small samples, such as those with only two data points, the correlation may not accurately reflect the population correlation. This highlights the importance of considering both sample size and distribution characteristics when interpreting correlation coefficients. Overall, the relationship between sample size and the accuracy of the correlation estimate is crucial in statistical analysis.
Ad VanderVen
Messages
169
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
The shape of the sampling distribution of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient depends on the size of the sample. Is the expectation of the sampling distribution of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient always equal to the population correlation coefficient, regardless of the sample size?
The shape of the sampling distribution of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient depends on the size of the sample. Is the expectation of the sampling distribution of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient always equal to the population correlation coefficient, regardless of the sample size?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ad VanderVen said:


The shape of the sampling distribution of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient depends on the size of the sample.

Doesn't it also depend on the joint distribution of the variables involved?

Ad VanderVen said:
Is the expectation of the sampling distribution of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient always equal to the population correlation coefficient, regardless of the sample size?

No, not according to the first paragraphs of https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2403&context=jmasm. However, I haven't read the entire article.
 
Consider the case of a sample of 2 data points.
 
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K