The forgotten magnetic scalar potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the existence of a magnetic scalar potential, denoted as ##\chi##, which relates to the magnetic field ##\vec{B}## through the equation $$\vec{B}=\nabla\chi+\nabla\times\vec{A}$$. It is established that ##\chi## satisfies Laplace's equation, indicating it has no time dependence. The conversation explores the implications of Gauss's law and Ampere's law, concluding that in magnetostatics, the scalar potential can be useful in regions devoid of currents. A specific example involving an infinitely long cylindrical wire illustrates how to derive the magnetic field from the scalar potential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, particularly divergence and curl operations
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations, specifically Gauss's law and Ampere's law
  • Knowledge of magnetostatics and the concept of magnetic fields
  • Basic understanding of Helmholtz's theorem and boundary conditions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the applications of magnetic scalar potential in various electromagnetic systems
  • Study the derivation and implications of Helmholtz's theorem in vector fields
  • Explore the mathematical treatment of cylindrical coordinates in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the role of boundary conditions in solving Laplace's equation for magnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in advanced topics related to magnetic fields and potentials.

Delta2
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
6,002
Reaction score
2,628
I wonder if there is any book that discusses the possibility of existence of a magnetic scalar potential. That is a scalar potential ##\chi## such that $$\vec{B}=\nabla\chi+\nabla\times\vec{A}$$. From Gauss's law for the magnetic field B we can conclude that it will always satisfy laplace's equation, therefore it will seemingly have no time dependence (even in the case of a time dependent vector potential A):
$$\nabla\cdot\vec{B}=0\Rightarrow \nabla\cdot(\nabla\chi+\nabla\times\vec{A})=0\Rightarrow\nabla^2\chi=0$$

Maxwell's Ampere's law seems to give us no additional information about this potential since it will be :
$$\nabla\times\vec{B}=\nabla\times (\nabla\chi+\nabla\times\vec{A})=\nabla\times(\nabla\chi)+\nabla\times(\nabla\times\vec{A})=0+\nabla\times(\nabla\times\vec{A})$$

So can we prove somehow that in most cases we have ##\chi=0## . Are there any specific systems known that ##\chi\neq 0##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point is that you overdetermine ##\vec{B}## by introducing an additional scalar potential. Of course you can always shuffle between potential and solenoidal parts of a field, but using Helmholtz's theorem together with the usual boundary conditions at infinity makes ##\vec{B}## a pure solenoidal field due to Gauss's Law for the magnetic field, ##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=0##.

Nevertheless, in magnetostatics, it's often convenient to introduce a scalar potential for the magnetic field in the region, where no currents are present, because there
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B}=\mu_0 \vec{j}=0.$$
You usually get a potential that's singular along a plane. Take, e.g., the infinitely long cylindrical wire. Outside of the wire you have ##\vec{j}=0## and thus you can make the ansatz ##\vec{B}=-\vec{\nabla} \chi##. Then you must have ##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=-\Delta \chi=0##. Due to symmetry in cylinder coordinates ##(r,\varphi,z)## you must have ##\chi=\chi(\varphi)##. This leads to
$$\Delta \chi=\frac{1}{r^2} \partial_{\varphi}^2 \chi=0 \; \Rightarrow \; \chi(\varphi)=C \varphi.$$
Then
$$\vec{B}=-C \vec{\nabla} \varphi=-\frac{C}{r} \vec{e}_{\varphi},$$
which is of course the correct solution. The potential is well-defined everywhere except along an arbitrary half-plane with the ##z##-axis as boundary, depending on which interval of length ##2 \pi## you choose for the domain of ##\varphi##.

The integration constant ##C## is defined by the total current through the cylinder, using the integral form of Ampere's Law along a circle in an arbitrary plane perpendicular to the wire
$$\int_C \mathrm{d} \vec{r} \cdot \vec{B}=-2 \pi C=i \; \Rightarrow\; C=-\frac{i}{2 \pi},$$
leading finally to
$$\vec{B}=\frac{i}{2 \pi r} \vec{e}_{\varphi}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
617
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
873
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
702
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
743
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K