The Future Predetermined? Free Will & Physics Simulation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of free will and determinism in the context of physics simulations. Participants explore whether the ability to simulate the future implies that it is predetermined, and how this relates to the notion of free will. The conversation touches on theoretical implications and philosophical perspectives rather than concrete outcomes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question if the future is predetermined when it can be simulated without error, suggesting this undermines the concept of free will.
  • Others reference the Heisenberg uncertainty principle as a counterargument, implying that complete predictability is not feasible.
  • One participant suggests that even with accurate simulations, causality predates the simulation, complicating the relationship between prediction and free will.
  • Another participant expresses a personal belief that free will does not exist, proposing that everything is set in motion, though acknowledging the argument is weak and based on assumptions.
  • Some participants mention compatibilism, a view that argues determinism does not negate free will, indicating a philosophical stance that may not align with strict determinism.
  • There is a recognition that the discussion of free will is complex and nebulous, with varying interpretations of agency and the nature of reality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of free will or the implications of determinism. Multiple competing views remain, with some advocating for determinism and others questioning its validity.

Contextual Notes

Participants express differing assumptions about causality, determinism, and the nature of reality, which influence their arguments. The discussion does not resolve these foundational issues.

dorohn
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
does that mean the future is already written,predetermined when it has been simulated? If so, then instead of the appearance of free choices, the universe itself is actually operating on causality? I mean, if the future can be simulated without error, then where does free will come in? Everything would have already been predicted and simulated @o@?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle, among other things, suggests that what you suggest is not possible.
 
russ_watters said:
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle, among other things, suggests that what you suggest is not possible.

ohhhhh! that's no fun! I sure hope one day we can at least get an accurate prediction of those lottery ball numbers. :P
 
Last edited:
dorohn said:
does that mean the future is already written,predetermined when it has been simulated? If so, then instead of the appearance of free choices, the universe itself is actually operating on causality? I mean, if the future can be simulated without error, then where does free will come in? Everything would have already been predicted and simulated @o@?

Try applying your premise to just a tiny subset of the future of the universe; i.e. the weather on Earth tomorrow. You've got your weatherman with his hotshot simulator showing you exactly what you can expect to happen tomorrow outside, and you know he's going to be right. But the weatherman and the simulator have not assumed causality. Causality predated the simulator.
 
I generally take the stand that free will does not exist, and that everything has already been set in motion. But I only have a weak a priori argument for it, and it requires an assumption that isn't necessary.

However, whether the universe is absolutely predetermined or somewhere in between (I don't accept that the universe is chaos... too much support otherwise), what we ought to do, and what we do do will not change. So predetermination's existence, in my opinion, is just an interesting thought exercise, as opposed to something that could have an interesting effect on our lives.
 
I mean, if the future can be simulated without error, then where does free will come in?

There is a longstanding view (called compatibilism) that claims determinism has no effect on the question of free will. Look it up.

I've never really investigated the free will issue - it seems to all be pretty nebulous.

I am sure that human beings are able to act as agents in the world, in so far as our actions affect the future course of events.

Do we really want any more than that? If we want to maintain that only the past is metaphysically real, and the future does not exist, I think we are asking too much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 241 ·
9
Replies
241
Views
33K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
6K